Bhupendra Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 6810 Raj

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6180/2021

Bhupendra Singh S/o Shri Jarnel Singh, aged about 42 Years, R/o Ward No. 25, Sri Ganganagar, District Sri Ganganagar (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan through the Secretary, Department Of Local Self, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. The Municipal Council, Sri Ganganagar through its Commissioner.

3. Dy. Director (Regional), Department of Local Self, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

4. The Dy. Director (Admn.), Department of Local Self, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh on behalf of Mr. Hamir Singh Sidhu.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Prajapat on behalf of Mr. Rajesh Parihar.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI

Order

07/05/2022

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

issue raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition is

squarely covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor

v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.1952/2019, decided on 06.07.2020, which in turn had relied

on order in the case of Roshan Lal Saini v. State & Ors. : S.B. Civil

Writ Petition No.18056/2015, decided on 09.03.2017.

(2 of 2) [CW-6180/2021]

In the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra), a coordinate

Bench of this Court inter alia directed as under:

"In this view of the matter, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the State Govt. to decide the matter at the earliest to facilitate issuance of requisite order of regularization of petitioner's services, strictly in accordance with law. The requisite exercise be undertaken by the State Govt. at the earliest, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date presentation of this order."

Learned counsel for the respondents, is not in a position to

dispute the fact that the issue raised in the present writ petition is

covered by judgment in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by

the petitioner is disposed of, in light of and with similar directions

as given in the case of Jitendra Kumar Tailor (supra).

(ARUN BHANSALI),J 127-DJ/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)