Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3581 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 179/2019
Pushpa Devi W/o Shri Gajanand Goyal and Anr.
----Petitioners
Versus
Nagar Parishad and Ors.
----Respondents
Connected With S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 48/2018 Gajanand Goyal
----Petitioner Versus Diwan Singh And Ors
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sohan Lal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 06/05/2022
Learned counsel for respondents has raised an argument that the
revision petitions arising out of final order in the proceedings under
Order 39 Rule 2A CPC is not maintainable. Learned counsel for
respondents wants to show judgment in this respect.
This issue shall remain open, subject to consideration at the time
of hearing of revision petitions.
Since, in S.B. Revision Petition No.179/2019, notice to respondent
Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 have already been served, let the notice to unserved
respondent No.3 be filed.
Let these revision petitions be heard for admission and
maintainability first, before issuing fresh notice to unserved respondent
No.3.
List these revision petitions for admission on 20.07.2022.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J SACHIN/17-18
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!