Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3544 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 5 May, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Review Petition (Writ) No. 104/2022
In
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1941/2021
1. Shankar Lal Raigar S/o Shri Gopi Lal, Aged About 49
Years, Resident of Indira Colony Second, Near Main
R.O.B., Bassi, District Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Guga Ram Balai S/o Shri Gumana Ram, Aged About 38
Years, Resident of Village Danpura, P.O. Pachota, Tehsil
Nawa, District Nagaur.
3. Laxman Ram Jat S/o Shri Suwa Lal Jat, Aged About 43
Years, Resident of Village Pachkodia, Post Mundoti, Via
Jobner, District Jaipur.
4. Rati Ram Bhuranda S/o Shri Jai Kishan Bhuranda, Aged
About 38 Years, Resident of Vpo Bhabaru, Tehsil Virat
Nagar, District Jaipur.
5. Abhilasha Arya W/o Shri Bhupendra Verma, Aged About
37 Years, Resident of Behind Abkari, Ganesh Nagar,
Taragarh Road, Chungi Chauki, Ramganj, Ajmer (Raj.)
6. Mahaveer Singh S/o Shri Harphool Singh, Aged About 45
Years, Resident of Vpo Bhangarh, Tehsil Bhadra, District
Hanumangarh.
7. Narsi Ram S/o Shri Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 44
Years, Resident of Vpo Nethrana, Tehsil Bhadra, District
Hanumangarh.
8. Hitesh Katara S/o Shri Geri Lal Katara, Aged About 33
Years, Resident of Village Saredi Bhilan, P.O. Suwala,
Tehsil Bagidora, District Banswara.
9. Kishor Kumar Nat S/o Shri Laxman, Aged About 34 Years,
Resident of Vpo Munger, Tehsil Sabala, District Dungarpur.
10. Bhim Sain S/o Shri Inderjeet Dharnia, Aged About 45
Years, Resident of Vpo Chak Tksp, Village Post 4 Ksp,
Tehsil Tibbi, District-Hanumangarh.
11. Gurpreet Singh S/o Shri Jarnail Singh, Aged About 28
Years, Resident of Vpo Bhakron Wali, Tehsil Sangaria,
District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
----Petitioners
(Downloaded on 11/05/2022 at 09:18:47 PM)
(2 of 3) [WRW-104/2022]
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Education Department, Government of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its
Secretary, Ghooghra Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.).
4. National Council of Teacher Education, Through Its
Director, G-7, Sector-10, Near Dwarka Metro Station, New
Delhi-110075.
5. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Through Its
Secretary And Director General, Krishi Bhawan, Dr.
Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi-110001.
6. Ramkesh Meena S/o Shri Bhompal Meena, Aged About 40
Years, Resident of Village Karela, Post Dhmurn Khurd,
Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.)
7. Keshram Gurjar S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 41
Years, Resident of Village Penchala, Post Lapawali, Tehsil
Todabhim, District Karauli.
8. Pushpendar Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 48
Years, Resident of Village Mahandpur, Post Bavekhar,
Tehsil Weir, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
9. Panchu Lal Shivran S/o Shri Hanuman Lal Shivran, Aged
About 38 Years, Resident of Raghunandanpura, Post
Moundoti, Via. Jobner, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur.
10. Shyoram Jat S/o Shri Nanu Ram Jat, Aged About 39
Years, Resident of Village Jundia, Post Ghinoi, Vai
Kaladera, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish K. Sharma, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Judgment / Order
05/05/2022
Heard.
(3 of 3) [WRW-104/2022]
This review petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking
issuance of a direction in modification of the earlier order passed
by the Court on the premise that the petitioners have already
represented the State Government but the Government is not
considering the matter for relaxation even though vacancies are
available.
On the issue of law, the petitioners' prayer in the writ
petition for granting relaxation was not found to be tenable in law.
This Court held that the petitioners have no vested right to insist
the Government to apply to NCTE (National Council of Teacher
Education) for relaxation.
The facts, which have been stated in the review petition, do
not call for any review of the order, particularly taking into
consideration the observations made in the order under review
that nothing is stated in the order preventing the petitioners for
pursuing their issue in the State Government. Therefore, the writ
review is dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Mohita /1
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!