Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Rajasthan vs Lal Chand Soni
2022 Latest Caselaw 4870 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4870 Raj
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
State Of Rajasthan vs Lal Chand Soni on 31 March, 2022
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 150/2021

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur Raj.

2. The Chief Engineer, Rural Public Health Engineering Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur Raj.

3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Taranagar, Distt. Churu Raj.

----Petitioners Versus Lal Chand Soni S/o Shri Panchilal Soni, Aged About 59 Years, By Cast Soni, R/o Naiyon Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 25, Tehsil Taranagar, Distt. Churu (Raj.)

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anjana Jawa For Respondent(s) : -

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

31/03/2022

1. The defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.

2. The present review petition is directed against the order

dated 18.01.2021, passed by this Court in writ petition filed by the

respondent.

3. A perusal of the order under consideration reveals that

though learned counsel for the petitioners had placed reliance on

the judgment rendered in case of Sohanlal Mathur Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.3631/2008,

decided on 17.11.2008, which has been affirmed by the Apex

Court in SLP (Civil)No.14932/2012, while disposing of the writ

(2 of 2) [WRW-150/2021]

petition, this Court has not given any finding about the petitioners'

case being covered by the judgments relied upon and has only

directed the present petitioner to consider respondent's

representation in terms of the judgment rendered in the case of

Sohan Lal (supra).

5. Hence, this Court does not find any error apparent on the

face of the record because rights of the petitioners have not been

decided. Obviously, the respondents shall be free to decide

petitioners' representation in accordance with law while

considering the referred judgments.

6. The review petition is, therefore, dismissed.

7. Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 19-Ramesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter