Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dungar Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 3457 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3457 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dungar Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 March, 2022
Bench: Sandeep Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 706/2021

Gaffur Khan S/o Sh. Rimmu Khan, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Jawaharpura, Tehsil Pachpadra, District Barmer. (Confined In Central Jail, Jodhpur)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhagirath Ray Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Chhaparwal, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

05/03/2022

The instant application for suspension of sentences under

Section 389 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by appellant-applicant

Gaffur Khan who has been convicted and sentenced for the

offences under Sections 302 and 201 of the IPC vide judgment

dated 19.08.2021 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Balotra in

Sessions Case No.43/2015. He has filed the instant application

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentences and

release on bail during pendency of the appeal.

We have heard and considered the submissions advanced by

Shri Bhagirath Ray Bishnoi, learned counsel representing the

appellant and learned Public Prosecutor and have gone through

the impugned judgment and the record.

(2 of 3) [SOSA-706/2021]

Shri Bishnoi vehemently and fervently urged that there is no

evidence worth the name on record of the case to connect the

appellant with the murder of his wife Smt. Nimaji. The prosecution

case is totally based on circumstantial evidence. However, none of

the prosecution witnesses has given convincing evidence so as to

connect the appellant with the alleged crime. The deceased, as a

matter of fact, fell into water tank and died by drowning. The case

has been given a false colour of murder because of ill-will and

animosity. He further urged that the FIR was lodged after a gross

delay. He further contended that the appellant is in custody for the

last nearly seven years. Hearing of the appeal is likely to consume

time. On these grounds, Shri Bishnoi implored the Court to accept

the application for suspension of sentences and direct release of

the appellant on bail.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently and

fervently opposed the submissions advanced by the appellant's

counsel and pointed out that the story which has been put-forth

by the defence regarding Smt. Nimaji having drowned in the

Tanka is totally fabricated. A perusal of the photographs (Ex.P/13

to Ex.P./16) would clearly indicate that there were no marks of

drowning on the dead body. The hair of the deceased were totally

dry. The clothes do not look as if they had been drenched. He

further pointed out that as per the postmortem report and the

evidence of medical jurist, the victim was strangulated to death.

The appellant has made an extra-judicial confession in presence of

the first informant and other witnesses, which fact has clearly

been narrated in the FIR (Ex.P/1), which was lodged on the very

next day after the incident.

(3 of 3) [SOSA-706/2021]

Having heard and considered the submissions advanced by

Shri Bishnoi, counsel representing the appellant and learned Public

Prosecutor and after going through the record, we are of the view

that the prosecution has led strong evidence before the trial court

in form of incriminating circumstances viz. extra-judicial

confession, postmortem report and the unnatural conduct of the

accused for proving his guilt. Whether or not the circumstances

constitute an unimpeachable unbroken links forming a complete

chain of circumstances would be for this Court to consider when

the appeal is being finally decided, however, the fact remains that

the victim was found murdered in her matrimonial household and

no timely information was given to her maternal family members.

In this background, we are of the opinion that the appellant

does not deserve indulgence of bail in this appeal.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentences is

dismissed as being devoid of merit.

The appeal shall be listed for hearing in the appropriate order

of priority.

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J 19-Sudhir Asopa/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter