Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2138 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8509/2019
M/s Prem Nath Bansal And Company
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board
----Respondent
Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7776/2019 Smt. Magan Devi W/o Shri P.r. Meena
----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board
----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8510/2019 M/s Yashdeep Marble Pvt. Ltd.
----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akhil Simlote, Adv.
Mr. Jaivardhan Singh Shekhawat, Adv. on behalf of Major R.P. Singh, Additional Advocate General (through video conferencing)
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Order
10/03/2022
Though, matter comes up on an application filed by the
respondent-Pollution Control Board & State, whereby application
under Article 226(3) of the Constitution of India has also been
filed.
(2 of 2) [CW-8509/2019]
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ
petitions filed by the petitioners itself are not maintainable as
there is a statutory efficacious alternative remedy against order
dated 22.02.2019 impugned in the present writ petitions, passed
under Section 25/26 of the Water (Prevention and Control of
Pollution) Act, 1974 and under Section 21/22 of the Air
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Mr. Akhil Simlote places
reliance on a judgment reported in 2010 (4) Western Law
Cases (Rajasthan) Page 412 (M/s Bahubali Stone Crusher
& 20 Ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board) and
the said judgment being set-aside by the Division Bench of this
Court in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.527/2010 (Rajasthan State
Pollution Control Board Vs. M/s Bahubali Stone Crusher)
vide order dated 23.11.2010.
Learned counsel for the petitioners may come prepared on
the next date of hearing.
Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the
petitioner is also pursuing his contempt petition filed before this
Court and learned counsel-Mr. Lokesh Kumar Sharma submitted
that if contempt petition is listed, necessary adjournment will be
sought by him.
List on 23.03.2022.
(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J
Ramesh Vaishnav /86/Bhavnesh Kumawat
22-24
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!