Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8320 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3692/2022
1. Manisha Kumari W/o Sahil Kumar, D/o Sh. Vinod Kumar, Aged About 22 Years, W.no. 8, Tibbi, Dist. Hanumangarh And Presently R/o Vill. Salemgarh, Teh. Tibbi, Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.).
2. Sahil Kumar S/o Sh. Suresh Kumar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vill. Salemgarh, Teh. Tibbi, Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Superintendent Of Police, Hanumangarh Through Govt. Advocate, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur (Raj.).
3. Sho, P.s. Tibbi, Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.).
4. Sh. Vinod Kumar S/o Sh. Madan Lal, W.no. 8, Tibbi, Dist.
Hanumangarh (Raj.).
5. Kuldeep Kumar S/o Sh. Narpat Singh, W.no. 8, Tibbi, Dist. Hanumangarh (Raj.).
----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himmat Jagga For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
27/06/2022
The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking direction for being
provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage on 05.06.2022. They submit that the
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-3692/2022]
marriage was performed against the wishes of their parents and
thus, they feel threat to their lives at the hands of respondent
Nos.4 and 5, who are family member and relatives of petitioner
No.1. The petitioners allegedly approached the Superintendent of
Police, Hanumangarh with a prayer to be provided with adequate
protection but no heed has been paid to their request so far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners
have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment
rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh
Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer
made by the petitioners for directing the S.P., Hanumangarh to
provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The Superintendent of Police, Hanumangarh shall have
the matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection
shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The
S.P. Hanumangarh shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
It is hereby clarified that this order may not be
construed to be a validation of petitioners' marriage and proof of
their age. Any observation made herein shall not affect any
criminal or civil proceedings initiated against the petitioners, at
the instance of their relatives.
The misc. petition as well as stay petition accordingly
stand disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J 77-Mamta/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!