Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9787 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 386/2018
Gopilal
----Appellant
Versus
Madanlal
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Hardik Gautam
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
26/07/2022
The appellant was pursing a remedy for the years of delay,
which caused delay in filing of the present appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application under Section 5 of
the Limitation Act, the same is allowed. The delay is condoned.
This Court is of the opinion that there are valid and
substantial grounds for grant of leave to the appellant for filing the
appeal against the impugned judgment.
Accordingly, the application for grant of leave to appeal is
allowed. The memo of leave to appeal be treated as an appeal and
it be registered as such.
Admit.
Call for the record.
Let bailable warrant of Rs.25,000/- be issued against the
accused-respondents.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
46-Zeeshan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!