Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 9525 Raj
Judgement Date : 21 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1071/2017
Mangi Lal S/o Toli Ram Heerawat, Aged About 59 Years, R/o
Kharsan, Tehsil Vallabhnagar, District Udaipur. (At present lodged
in Central Jail, Udaipur).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State, Through P.p.
2. Prahlad Menariya S/o Devi Lal, R/o Kharsan, Tehsil
Vallabhnagar, District Udaipur.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Paliwal
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
Mr. Naresh Khatri
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
21/07/2022
It is stated at Bar that a compromise has been arrived at
between the parties after the judgment dated 22.04.2017 passed
by the appellate court whereby the judgment dated 11.01.2016
passed by the trial court has been affirmed. It is borne out from
the compromise that the complainant is not inclined to proceed
further in the matter.
Counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a decision of
Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs Sayed
Babalal H [2010(5) SCC 66].
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
since the parties have settled the dispute and complainant
respondent No.2 had accepted the sum towards full and final
settlement of the cheque, on the satisfaction of the complainant
(Downloaded on 22/07/2022 at 08:58:26 PM)
(2 of 2)
and in the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view
of law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of
Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (supra), the sentence
awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act is
liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has been
arrived at after rejection of the appeal preferred by the petitioner,
a cost of 15% of the cheque amount deserves to be imposed upon
the petitioner in the light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble
Apex court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra).
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit 15% of the
cheque amount with the State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur
within a period of two weeks from today.
The conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded to the
petitioner for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments
Act, vide judgment dated 11.01.2016 passed by the learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vallabhnagar, District Udaipur
in Criminal Case No.27/08 as affirmed by judgment dated
22.04.2017 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.2,
Udaipur in Appeal No.17/2016, is hereby set aside on the basis of
the aforesaid compromise.
Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed of. All
pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
C-1-Jitender/nirmala
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!