Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kailashchandra vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 8586 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8586 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kailashchandra vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 July, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 690/2022

Kailashchandra S/o Hira Lal, Aged About 57 Years, B/c Bafna, R/
o Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh (Raj.) (At Present Lodged At
District Jail, Pratapgarh)
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Manish Kumar Pitaliya
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

04/07/2022
     Admit.

     Call for the record.

     Notice need not be issued as learned PP accepts notice on

behalf of respondent-State.

     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned PP on

application of suspension of sentence No.230/2022.

     Counsel for the petitioner has shown from para-11 of the

impugned judgment that complete amount in dispute has been

deposited by the petitioner.

     Counsel for the petitioner has submitted report of MRI Scan,

which suggests that the petitioner is suffering from Mild Cerebral

Atrophy.

     Counsel for petitioner seeks suspension of sentence.

     Ordinarily, this Court does not suspend sentence without


                    (Downloaded on 05/07/2022 at 08:39:35 PM)
                                             (2 of 3)                     [CRLR-690/2022]


calling for record but looking to acute medical condition of

petitioner as well as the fact that compromise between the parties

is recorded in para-11 of impugned judgment, this Court deems it

appropriate to suspend the sentence.

     The result of compromise, however, shall be examined by the

Court at the time of final hearing.

     Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence under

Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. filed on behalf of accused petitioner is

allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by learned

Additional    Chief     Judicial      Magistrate,         Chhoti       Sadri,   District

Pratapgarh in Criminal Original Case No.446/2004 (68/02) vide

order dated 14.02.2014; as modified and affirmed by learned

Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of

Atrocities Act Cases), Pratapgarh vide order dated 27.06.2022 in

Criminal     Appeal      No.69/2016           (11/2014)             against   petitioner

Kailashchandra S/o. Hira Lal, shall remain suspended till final

disposal of aforesaid revision and the petitioner shall be released

on bail provided the petitioner furnishes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of learned trial judge for his appearance before the

Registrar (Judicial) of this Court on or before 16.08.2022 and

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the present revision

on the conditions indicated below:-

             1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in
             the month of January of every year till the revision is
             decided.
             2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of
             residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their



                        (Downloaded on 05/07/2022 at 08:39:35 PM)
                                                                                 (3 of 3)                [CRLR-690/2022]


                                                   changed address to the trial Court as well as to the
                                                   counsel in the High Court.
                                                   3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s),
                                                   they will give in writing their changed address to the
                                                   trial Court.

                                         The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

                                   order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

                                   Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

                                   relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

                                   case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

                                   court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

                                   Court for cancellation of bail.



                                                                     (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

159-Sanjay/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter