Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prakash Puri vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 8521 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8521 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Prakash Puri vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 July, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                        (1 of 3)                  [CRLAS-887/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 887/2022

1.     Prakash Puri S/o Bhanwar Puri, Aged About 60 Years, R/o
       Manaklao Karwad Ps Dist. Jodhpur
2.     Madan Puri S/o Nain Puri, Aged About 48 Years, R/o
       Manaklao Karwad Ps Dist. Jodhpur
3.     Mukesh Puri S/o Madan Puri, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
       Manaklao Karwad Ps Dist. Jodhpur
4.     Kanwar Puri S/o Bhanwar Puri, Aged About 50 Years, R/o
       Manaklao Karwad Ps Dist. Jodhpur
5.     Indra Puri S/o Kanwar Puri, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
       Manaklao Karwad Ps Dist. Jodhpur
6.     Padam Puri S/o Om Puri, Aged About 40 Years, R/o
       Manaklao Karwad Ps Dist. Jodhpur
7.     Raju Puri S/o Madan Puri, Aged About 24 Years, R/o
       Manaklao Karwad Ps Dist. Jodhpur
                                                                  ----Appellants
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Manohar Singh Hada with
                                Mr. Tanay Jain
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Abhishek Purohit, Addl.G.A.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

01/07/2022

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of

respondent-State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Call for the record.



                     (Downloaded on 02/07/2022 at 08:36:53 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-887/2022]


     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.539/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the sentence

awarded to the appellants has been suspended by the learned trial

court temporarily.

     Learned   Public      Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension   of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellants.

     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

539/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 06.06.2022 in Sessions Case No.17/2015

against appellants- (1) Prakash Puri S/o Bhanwar Puri; (2)

Madan Puri S/o Nain Puri; (3) Mukesh Puri S/o Madan Puri;

(4) Kanwar Puri S/o Bhanwar Puri; (5) Indra Puri S/o

Kanwar Puri; (6) Padam Puri S/o Om Puri and (7) Raju Puri

S/o Madan Puri shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal, provided each of them executes a personal bond

in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in

this court on 01.08.2022 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That they will appear before the trial Court in the

           month of January of every year till the appeal is

           decided.



                      (Downloaded on 02/07/2022 at 08:36:53 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-887/2022]


                                        2.    That if the appellants changes the place of

                                              residence, they will give in writing their changed

                                              address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

                                              in the High Court.


                                        3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

                                              they will give in writing their changed address to

                                              the trial Court.

                                        The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

                                   shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

                                   file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

                                   to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

                                   said accused appellants do not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

12-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter