Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4748 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 12 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1808/2022
1. Bharat Raj Meena S/o Pappu Lal Meena, Aged About 20
Years, R/o Village Abra, Post Raithal, District Bundi,
Rajasthan.
2. Pawan Kumawat S/o Kanhaiya Lal Kumawat, Aged About
25 Years, R/o Village Kishanpura Masaldaran, Post
Shergarh, Tehsil Atru, District Baran, Rajasthan.
3. Kailash Chand Kumawat S/o Ramkaran Kumawat, Aged
About 26 Years, R/o Village Boraj, Tehsil Moujmabad,
District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Shankar Lal Todawata S/o Ramkaran Todawata, Aged
About 28 Years, R/o Village Sawaimadhosinghpura, Tehsil
Mozmabad, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Sita Ram S/o Norang Lal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward
No. 3, Village Dhani Khokhran, Tehsil Bhadra, District
Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary And
Commissioner, Department Of Agriculture, Pant Krishi
Bhawan, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order
12/07/2022
Counsel for the petitioners submits that various questions
raised by the petitioners including Question Nos. 57 & 100 have
not been considered by the Expert Committee.
(2 of 2) [CW-1808/2022]
Counsel for the respondent(s) submits that the Expert
Committee has thoroughly examined the various objections raised
by the petitioners and relied upon the judgment passed by the Co-
ordinate Bench of this Court at Principal Seat Jodhpur in the
matter of Phoosgir & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and
other connected matters (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.
17265/2021) and the said writ petition has been dismissed vide
order dated 23.03.2022 which reads as under;
"In view of above factual & legal position, wherein the expert committee, after considering the objections raised by the candidates, based on the relevant material, has made a decision regarding change in the answer as indicated in the preliminary answer key / maintaining the answer / deleting the question, for lack of any creditable challenge / glaring mistake falling within the parameters as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Division Bench of this Court, no case for interference is made out. The writ petitions are, therefore, dismissed."
In that view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed in
view of the judgment passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this
Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in the matter of Phoosgir
(supra).
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /148
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!