Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4441 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3706/2018
1. Smt Sharda Devi W/o Late Shri Babulal, Aged About 52
Years, R/o 2760, Purviyon Ka Chowk, Khajane Walon Ka
Rasta, Jaipur.
2. Neetu D/o Late Shri Babulal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o
2760, Purviyon Ka Chowk, Khajane Walon Ka Rasta,
Jaipur.
----Appellants
Versus
1. Trilochan Singh S/o Shri Devendra Singh, Aged About 38
Years, R/o C/756, Krishna Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan
(Driver)
2. Smt. Krishna Saini W/o Shri Murari Lal Saini, R/o 34-35,
Kirti Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Owner)
3. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Through Manager,
Regional Office, Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road,
Jaipur (Insurer)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Prashant Joshi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Judgment
04/07/2022
Instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant-claimants
against the judgment and award dated 03.04.2018 passed by the
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jaipur District, Jaipur (for short
'the Tribunal') in MAC case No.877/2005 whereby the claim
petition filed by the claimants-appellants was dismissed.
Counsel for the appellants submits that it is not in dispute
that the accident has occurred on 13.10.2005 by the rash and
negligent driving of driver of the offending vehicle and after
(2 of 2) [CMA-3706/2018]
investigation, police submitted chargeseet, so, the Tribunal has
committed an error in rejecting the claim petition filed by the
claimants-appellants.
I have considered the submissions made by counsel for the
appellants on merits.
Bare perusal of the impugned award clearly indicates that on
earlier occasion also, the claim petition was dismissed by the
Tribunal vide judgment and order dated 17.04.2011, against
which, the claimants submitted SB Civil Misc. Appeal
No.3906/2011 before this Court and the same was disposed of on
11.08.2016 and the matter was remanded to the Tribunal to
decide the issue No.1 afresh.
After remand of the matter, the matter was decided afresh
by the Tribunal and the Tribunal has come to the conclusion that
offending vehicle was falsely implicated in order to get the claim.
Perusal of the impugned order clearly indicates that the
claimants have failed to adduce adequate evidence in their
support and the Tribunal has not committed any error in rejecting
the claim petition filed by the claimants-appellants.
Hence, there is no illegality in the order passed by the
Tribunal. This appeal is devoid of merit and same is hereby
dismissed.
All pending applications, if any stand disposed of.
Record of the Tribunal be sent back forthwith.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
HEENA GANDHI /51
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!