Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 890 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 48/2022
Sohanlal Godara S/o Shri Chhagan Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Bhompura, Via Sandwa, Presently Posted As Teacher, Govt. Secondary School, Bhatolai, Tehsil Bidasar, District Churu.
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Ashok Kumar Atri S/o Mahaveer Prasad Atri (Swami), R/o Pragati Nagar, Sujangarh, District Churu.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. GR Punis, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Punia, through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pradeep Khinchi, through VC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Judgment
18/01/2022
The present revision petition has been filed against the
judgment dated 27.10.2021 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions
Judge, Sujangarh, District Churu in cr. appeal no.3/2019 affirming
the judgment and order dated 29.1.2019 passed by the learned
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sujangarh in Criminal Original Case
No.135/2015 whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced
under Section 138 of the NI Act to two years simple imprisonment
with a direction to pay a sum of Rs. 7,50,000/- as compensation
and in default of payment of fine to further undergo three months
imprisonment.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the
pendency of the present revision petition, the entire amount has
(2 of 2) [CRLR-48/2022]
been paid to the complainant. He further submits that the dispute
of the non-payment of the amount has been settled between the
parties by entering into a compromise. In this regard, the
petitioner has also submitted copy of the affidavit on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the judgment
of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of MP Vs. Laxmi
Narayan & ors. Reported in AIR 2019 SC 1296 and Damodar S.
Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. reported in 2010 (5) SCC 663.
The fact of compromise is not disputed by the counsel for the
complainant-respondent.
In view of the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and
the compromise having been entered into between the parties, the
present revision petition is allowed and the orders dated
27.10.2021 and 29.1.2019 are hereby quashed and set aside.
If the petitioner is in the judicial custody, he be released
forthwith.
All the interlocutory applications as well as the stay
application also stand disposed of accordingly.
(MADAN GOPAL VYAS),J 84-CPGoyal/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!