Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 769 Raj
Judgement Date : 14 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 145/2022
Atmaram S/o Shri Harchand Ram, Aged About 68 Years, R/o
Village Suwala, District Barmer (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (Rsrtc),
Jaipur Through Its Managing Director.
2. The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport
Corporation (Rsrtc), Barmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devki Nandan Vyas (on VC)
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suniel Purohit (on VC)
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
14/01/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to
refrain from coming to the Courts.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the
dispute raised in present writ petition has already been
adjudicated by this Court in Daulat Ram Vs. Chairman & Managing
Director, RSRTC & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9687/2015, decided
on 01.10.2015) and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be
disposed of in light of the said judgment.
This Court, while deciding the case of Daulat Ram(supra),
directed as under:-
"In this background, these writ petitions deserve to be and
are hereby allowed. The respondent Corporations directed to
reimburse the entire dues of all its retired employees under all
(Downloaded on 17/01/2022 at 08:45:24 PM)
(2 of 2) [CW-145/2022]
heads including retiral benefits, overtime, night allowance,
earned leave etc. within a period of six months. The due amount
shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of accrual till the
date of actual payment. The petitioners shall be at liberty to
submit detailed representations to the concerned officers to
settle the accounts and facilitate the assessment of dues at the
earliest.
No order as to costs."
In view of above, this writ petition is also allowed in light of
the judgment in case of Daulat Ram (supra) with the same
directions, as quoted hereinbefore.
The above order shall be subject to following conditions:-
(i) While making the payment to the petitioner, respondent-
Corporation shall take into account the corresponding
seniority (on the basis of date of retirement) of all the retired
employees.
(ii) In case, the respondents find petitioner's case as emergent,
payment may be made to him, out of the seniority in terms
of the order dated 30.03.2017, passed by Jaipur Bench of
this Court in SBCWP No.9127/2016.
(iii) The respondents may defer payment of interest of gratuity
for the time being, as observed in the proceedings dated
17.01.2020 in SBWCP No.992/2018.
The stay application also stands disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
16-Zeeshan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!