Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 662 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15572/2021
Fatehlal Paliwal S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar Paliwal, Aged About 34
Years, R/o Village And Post Chhila, Tehsil Phalodi, District
Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Presently Posted On The Post Of Ldc In
Panchayat Samiti Sankara, Headquarter Pokhran, District
Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
(Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. District Programme Coordinator And District Collector,
Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
4. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Sankara,
Headquarter Pokhran, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh (on VC)
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Utkarsh Singh for Mr. Sunil
Beniwal, AAG (on VC)
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/01/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to
refrain from coming to the Courts.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the
issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by
order of this Court in Satdev v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.9899/2019, decided on 25.7.2019,
(Downloaded on 13/01/2022 at 08:48:46 PM)
(2 of 2) [CW-15572/2021]
wherein, this Court inter alia came to conclusion and directed as
under:-
"In view thereof, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is
allowed in light of judgment in the case of Om Prakash (supra).
The petitioner may make a representation to the respondents
pointing out the requisite dates etc., based on which, the
respondents would deal with the representation while according
notional benefits to the petitioner from the date persons similarly
situated to the petitioner, were accorded appointment by the
respondents.
Needful may be done by the respondents within a period
of four weeks from the date such representation alongwith a
copy of this order is placed by the petitioner before the
respondents."
Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to
dispute that the issue is identical to the case of Satdev (supra).
In view of the above fact situation, the writ petition filed by
the petitioner is allowed with similar directions as given in the
case of Satdev (supra).
Stay petition also stands disposed of accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
11-Zeeshan
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!