Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 520 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2022
(1 of 3) [CW-256/2022]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 256/2022
1. Ram Vilas, Aged About 44 Years, Head Constable No. 100,
Present Working In O/o Commandant, 3Rd Bn., R.a.c.,
Bikaner.
2. Liyakat Ali Khan S/o Shri Ummed Khan, Aged About 45
Years, Constable No. 900, Present Working In O/o
Commandant, 3Rd Bn., R.a.c., Bikaner.
3. Braj Lal S/o Shri Birbal Ram, Aged About 44 Years,
Constable No. 247, Present Working In O/o Commandant,
3Rd Bn., R.a.c., Bikaner.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
Department Of Finance (Rules), Government Of
Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Adgp (Armed Battalion), Phq- Rajasthan Police, Lal
Kothi, Jaipur.
3. The Commandant, 3Rd Bn.,r.a.c., Bikaner.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harshvardhan Singh on VC.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
10/01/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, lawyers have been advised to
refrain from coming to the Courts.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has drawn attention of
this Court towards the judgment passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of
this Court in Sarwan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors
(SBCWP No.11771/2021) decided on 02.09.2021 and learned
(Downloaded on 13/01/2022 at 08:34:07 PM)
(2 of 3) [CW-256/2022]
counsel for the petitioners seeks disposal in the same terms. The
order dated 02.09.2021 reads as follows:-
"Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very
outset, submits that the controversy raised in the
instant writ petition stands resolved in view of the
adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court
in the case of Kuldeep Singh & Ors. Versus State of
Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.3926/2013, decided on 26.04.2013.
It is further contended that for the present; the
petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents
are directed to consider and decide the representation
of the petitioner, within a time frame, in the backdrop
of the adjudication in the case of Kuldeep Singh & Ors.
(supra), which he is ready and willing to address
within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the
instant writ petition proceedings are closed with a
direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive
representation before the respondents enclosing a
copy of the order in the case of Kuldeep Singh & Ors.
(supra).
In case, a representation is so addressed within
the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are
directed to consider and decide the same by a
reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as
possible in accordance with law, however, in no case
later than three months from the date of receipt of the
representation along with a certified copy of this
order.
With the observations and directions, as
indicated above, the writ petition stands disposed of.
The stay application also stands disposed of. "
(Downloaded on 13/01/2022 at 08:34:07 PM)
(3 of 3) [CW-256/2022]
In view of the above, the present writ petition as well as stay
petition also disposed of in terms of the order passed by a
Coordinate Bench of this Court in Sarwan Singh (Supra).
All pending applications also stand disposed of accordingly.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.
51-Sudheer/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!