Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Mohan Trading Agencies vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr
2022 Latest Caselaw 476 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 476 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
M/S Mohan Trading Agencies vs State Of Rajasthan And Anr on 19 January, 2022
Bench: Pankaj Bhandari
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5142/2016

M/s Mohan Trading Agencies Near Talkies Cinema Ajmer Through
Its Proprietor Shri Hakanmal Son Of Shri Veerumal, aged about
79 years, R/o Near Shri Talkies, Ajmer.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.      State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
2.      M/s Bajrang Udhyog, 1014, Agrawal Market, Mishar Raja
        Ji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar Through Single Owner Shri
        Bajrang Lal Soni,
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Sharma through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gautam Bhadadra thorugh VC For State : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

19/01/2022

1. Matter comes up on an application for

modification/clarification of the order dated 15.05.2017 passed by

this Court.

2. It is contended by counsel for the applicant that a cheque

dishonour complaint filed by the complainant-M/s Bajrang Udhyog

was allowed and M/s Mohan Trading Agencies was convicted under

the Negotiable Instrument Act. An appeal preferred by M/s Mohan

Trading Agencies was also dismissed by the appellate Court. It is

also contended that to avoid execution of the arrest warrants,

applicant M/s Mohan Trading Agencies approached the High Court

and the High Court vide order dated 15.05.2017 permitted the

petitioner to deposit Rs.50,000/- before the Court below and on

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5142/2016]

deposition of the amount, it was directed that the arrest warrant

would stand cancelled.

3. It is informed by counsel that Rs.50,000/- has been

deposited but the said amount was not returned to the M/s

Bajrang Udhyog and there was no direction of the Court.

4. I have considered the contentions.

5. Since the amount was deposited, as per the direction of this

Court and as per the orders passed by the Court below, M/s

Mohan Trading Agencies was required to deposit a sum of

Rs.50,000/- and a sum of Rs.45,600/- was to be paid to M/s

Bajrang Udhyog.

6. Application for modification/clarification of the order dated

15.05.2017 is allowed. Out of the amount of Rs.50,000/-

deposited by M/s Mohan Trading Agencies, Rs.45,600/- is to be

paid to M/s Bajrang Udhyog.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

ARTI SHARMA /52

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter