Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prakash vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 377 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 377 Raj
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Prakash vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 January, 2022
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11115/2021

Prakash S/o Chena Ram, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Mandla Kalla Police Station Phalodi Dist. Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail, Ratangarh).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chandra Bishnoi through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Judgment

06/01/2022 Lawyers are not appearing in the Court in view of the

unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to

pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection

with F.I.R. No. 141/2019, Police Station Rajaldesar, District Churu,

for the offence under Sections 8/15, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned

Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on

record.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused

Bachna Ram from whom the contraband was recovered has

already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court

vide order dated 10.03.2021. Learned counsel further submits

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-11115/2021]

that the case of the present petitioner stands on a better footing

to the co-accused Bachna Ram and the case of the present

petitioner is not distinguishable from the case of the co-accused

who has already been released on bail by a Coordinate Bench of

this Court. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time,

therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

The charge sheet in the case has been filed.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application

but he is unable to distinguish the case of the present petitioner

vis-a-vis the case of the co-accused person who has been

enlarged on bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

upon a consideration of the arguments advanced and considering

the fact that the case of the present petitioner is identical to co-

accused aforesaid who has been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate

Bench of this Court as also the present situation of the country

due to pandemic of corona virus (COVID-19), in particular the

jails, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is also entitled

for the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Prakash

S/o Chena Ram shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R.

No.141/2019, Police Station Rajaldesar, District Churu provided he

executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees: One

Lac Only) with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-

(Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-11115/2021]

and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till

the completion of the trial.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

9-Shahenshah/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter