Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 19 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2214/2015
Prem Chand Chopra
----Appellant
Versus
Smt Sita Devi And Others
----Respondent
Connected With S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2652/2019 Smt. Sitadevi W/o Late Jagdish
----Appellant Versus Shri Indraj S/o Shriram
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra through VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
03/01/2022
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2214/2015:-
The appellant has filed an application for early listing of the
appeal, the same is allowed.
This appeal has been filed by the owner of vehicle assailing
the judgment and award dated 18th October, 2013. The appeal was
delayed, therefore, an application under Section 5 of Limitation
Act was also filed and on the application, notices were issued to
the respondents vide order dated 2nd August, 2017 but the same
have not been served so far. As far as respondent Nos.1 & 2 are
concerned, counsel-Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain puts in appearance on
there behalf hence, no need to issue notices. For respondent No.3,
(2 of 2) [CMA-2214/2015]
the appellant has filed a separate application seeking his
transposition as appellant. The orders on this application would be
passed after service of notices upon the remaining respondents.
Issue fresh notice of application under Section 5 of Limitation
Act as also of appeal to the respondent No.4 to 7, returnable
within four weeks. Notices be filed in two sets one to be served by
ordinary process and another by registered post.
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2652/2019:-
This appeal has been filed by the claimants for enhancement
of amount of compensation. The appeal is delayed, therefore a
separate application under Section 5 of Limitation Act has also
been filed.
Issue notice to the respondents of application under Section
5 of Limitation Act as also of appeal, returnable within four weeks.
Notices be filed in two sets one to be served by ordinary
process and another by registered post.
As far as respondent Nos.1 & 2 (owner and driver of vehicle)
are concerned Advocate Mr. Vikas Kabra puts in appearance,
therefore no need to issue notices to respondent Nos.1 & 2. Notice
be only issued to the remaining respondents.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SAURABH/18-19
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!