Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sachin Patil S/O Madhukar vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 1673 Raj/2

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1673 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2022

Rajasthan High Court
Sachin Patil S/O Madhukar vs State Of Rajasthan on 22 February, 2022
Bench: Uma Shanker Vyas
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

             S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 154/2022

Sachin Patil S/o Madhukar, Resident Of Holi Chowk Ke Pass
Maruti Mandir Mohalla Dhuliya District Mumbai (Maharashtra)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
                                                                 ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

Order

22/02/2022

This criminal revision petition has been filed against the

order dated 24.01.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge,

N.D.P.S. cases Jhalawar, (Rajasthan), whereby the application filed

by the accused-petitioner under Section 451 for releasing the

vehicle truck bearing registration No.MH-18-AA-9113 has been

dismissed.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that

the petitioner is registered owner of the vehicle and there is no

other rival claim for its release. Relying on the judgments of the

Hon'ble Apex Court of India in cases of Sunderbhai Ambalal

Desai vs. State of Gujarat, (2002) 10 SCC 290 and

Coordinate Bench Judgments dated 14.08.2012 in S.B.

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.2682/2012, Phool Singh

vs. State of Rajasthan and in cases of Bal Mikand vs.

State,1994 Cri Lr (Raj) 4, Prakash Chand vs. State of

(2 of 3) [CRLR-154/2022]

Rajasthan, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

No.416/2010 decided on 12.03.2010 & Laxman vs. State of

Rajasthan, S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.61/2018

decided on 16.04.2018, learned counsel submitted that vehicle

be given to the petitioner on furnishing 'supurdginama'.

Opposing the prayer, learned Public Prosecutor submitted

that vehicle in question was used for commission of offence under

the provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

Act, 1985 (for brevity "the Act of 1985") and can be subject-

matter of confiscation under Section 60 of the Act of 1985 and

hence, the petitioner is not entitled for release of the vehicle in his

favour.

Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the

record.

It is undisputed that petitioner is registered owner of the

vehicle in question which has not been claimed by any other

person. Now, it is no more res integra that vehicle seized under

the provisions of the Act of 1985 can be released in favour of its

registered owner; though, may be an accused, if no order of

confiscation has been passed, which has not been done in the

present case.

In these circumstances, this criminal revision petition

deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. The order

dated 24.01.2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, N.D.P.S.

cases Jhalawar, (Rajasthan) is quashed and set aside. It is

directed that the vehicle truck bearing registration No.MH-18-AA-

9113 be released in favour of the petitioner on 'supurdginama' on

his producing original registration certificate and on satisfying

following conditions:-

(3 of 3) [CRLR-154/2022]

(1) He furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court undertaking to produce the vehicle in question in the Court as and when required to do so.

(2) He shall get the vehicle in question photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case. (3) The personal bonds of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bond of sureties shall further carry the photographs of persons identifying them before the Court with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.

(4) The petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the vehicle in question and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable and produce the same before the Court as and when required.

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

DANISH USMANI/60

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter