Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1563 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 15 February, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8014/2018
Panna Lal Raiger Son Of Shri Nanhu Ram Raiger, aged about 64
years, Resident Of Gali No. 13, Shivaji Colony, Newai, District
Tonk.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Co-
Operative Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Nehru Sahkar
Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur.
3. Tonk District Cooperative Bhoomi Vikas Bank Limited,
Kisan Sahakar Bhawan, Civil Lines Tonk Through Its
Administrator.
4. Tonk District Cooperative Bhoomi Vikas Bank Limited,
Kisan Sahakar Bhawan, Civil Lines Tonk Through Its
Secretary.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Raghav, AAG,
Mr. Ram Kumar Sharma and
Mr. Ajay Pratap
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
15/02/2022 For the reasons stated in the application (2/2022) filed by
the petitioner for taking legal representatives of deceased
petitioner-Panna Lal Raiger on record, the same is allowed. Legal
representatives of deceased petitioner-Panna Lal Raiger are taken
on record. Amended cause title appended with the application is
also taken on record.
(2 of 2) [CW-8014/2018]
In the application (1/2022) filed by the petitioner, it has been
stated that the controversy involved herein, i.e., as to entitlement
of the petitioner for enhanced amount of gratuity under Payment
of Gratuity (Amendment) Act, 2010, is no more res-integra and
stands resolved by the judgment of this Court dated 06.12.2021 in
SBCWP No.5120/2018: Geeta Ram Gupta & Ors. Vs. Tonk
District Cooperative Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. & Anr. and a
prayer has been made for disposal of the instant writ petition in
light thereof.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant
writ petition may be decided in light of direction issued by this
Court vide its order dated 06.12.2021 in case of Geeta Ram Gupta
& Ors. (supra).
Learned counsels for the respondents did not dispute the
aforesaid position and submitted that the instant writ petition may
also be disposed of in similar terms.
In view thereof, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of
directions contained in the case of Geeta Ram Gupta & Ors.
(supra) which shall apply mutatis mutandis in this case also.
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
MADAN/48
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!