Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1519 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 14 February, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9075/2021
1. Bhim Singh S/o Sh. Rewant Singh, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
2. Rukma Nand Saini S/o Sh. Toru Ram, Aged About 61
Years, R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
3. Suresh Kumar S/o Sh. Chhaganlal Sharma, Aged About
34 Years, R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan,
Tehsil Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
4. Kan Singh S/o Sh. Pahar Singh, Aged About 77 Years, R/o
Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
5. Ram Niwas S/o Sh. Mangla Ram, Aged About 46 Years,
R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
6. Narpat Singh S/o Sh. Khinw Singh, Aged About 37 Years,
R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
7. Ummed Singh S/o Sh. Mahavir Singh, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
8. Prithvi Singh S/o Sh. Shaitan Singh, Aged About 74
Years, R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
9. Ramesh Kumar S/o Sh. Chothu Ram, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
10. Shimbhu Singh S/o Sh. Ugam Singh, Aged About 41
Years, R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
11. Kalyan Singh S/o Sh. Hanuman Singh, Aged About 44
Years, R/o Village Chhinchhas, Post Kumas Jataan, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar (Raj.) 332311.
----Petitioners
(Downloaded on 19/02/2022 at 09:23:10 PM)
(2 of 3) [CW-9075/2021]
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Govt Of
Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The District Collector Sikar, Collectorate Sikar, Sikar (Raj.)
3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate Laxmangarh, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist Sikar (Raj.)
4. Tehsildar, Laxmangarh, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Dist Sikar
(Raj.)
5. The Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation, Tehsil
Laxmangarh, Dist Sikar (Raj.)
6. Secretary Gram Panchayat, Kumas Jataan, Panchayat
Samiti Laxmangarh, Dist Sikar (Raj.)
7. Smt. Saraswati Godara W/o Sh Ghisa Ram Godara
Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kumas Jataan, Panchayat
Samiti Laxmangarh, Dist Sikar (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahipal S. Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Dy. G.C.
through VC Mr. Rahul Agrawal
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AKIL KURESHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Judgment
14/02/2022
The petitioners in this public interest petition has complained
about allocation of 0.19 hectares of land for the purpose of
crematorium in the village. The area of land allotted is extremely
small. The purpose stated is for cremation. In this public interest
petition therefore we are not inclined to entertain the allegation
of allocation of land for the said purpose for favouring an
individual family is not established. In any case we fail to
(3 of 3) [CW-9075/2021]
understand how allocation of a small piece of a government land
for cremation would benefit anyone at all.
In the result the public interest petition is dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J (AKIL KURESHI),CJ
BRIJ MOHAN GANDHI/32
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!