Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7781 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 187/2022
1. Smt. Nirmal Yadav W/o Shri Ashwini Kumar Yadav, Aged
About 56 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 2 And 3, Geejgarh
Vihar, Hawa Sadak, Jaipur.
2. Ashwini Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Vedprakash, Aged About
59 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 2 And 3, Geejgarh Vihar,
Hawa Sadak, Jaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Urban Development And Housing,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Indira
Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Zone-5, Jaipur Development
Authority, Indira Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur.
4. The Director, Local Fund Audit Department, Rajasthan,
Vitt Bhawan, Jaipur.
5. The Collector, Jaipur District, Collectorate, Banipark,
Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.C. Sharma Mr. Bhrigu Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PANKAJ MITHAL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
13/12/2022
Heard learned counsel for the review petitioners. The
petitioners have applied for review of the judgment and order
dated 23.08.2022 passed by the Division Bench whereby appeal of
the review petitioners had been dismissed. The plot of the
(2 of 2) [WRW-187/2022]
petitioners faces Hawa Sadak (main road) and, therefore, the
respondents have applied the reserve price prescribed for the
Hawa Sadak which cannot be faulted with.
In view of the above, we find no substance in the review
petition.
It is accordingly dismissed.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J (PANKAJ MITHAL),CJ
ANIL KUMAR GOYAL /Charu/2
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!