Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7581 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 88/2013
Gyan Chand Sanghi S/o Shri Ram Pal Sanghi
----Appellant-defendant
Versus
Radhey Shyam And Others
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. M.C. Jain
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
01/12/2022
Appellant-defendant by way of this second appeal has
challenged the decree for eviction passed in favour of
respondents-plaintiffs vide judgment dated 3.12.2008, which has
been affirmed in first appeal vide judgment dated 5.1.2013.
It has been stated that appellant came to know from
execution proceedings that respondent No.2- Ramesh Chandra
had died and therefore, to bring his legal representatives on
record, application has been filed under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC along
with application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and
application under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC.
No one has appeared to oppose the applications.
Taking into consideration the nature of impugned decree
which is joint in favour of all respondents-plaintiffs, the delay in
filing the application is condoned. Abatement of appeal qua
respondents is set aside and legal representatives of respondent
No.2 are allowed to be substituted in his place.
(2 of 2) [CSA-88/2013]
Counsel for appellant undertakes to file the amended cause
title. On filing the same, notices be issued to newly impleaded
legal representatives.
List again on 12.1.2023.
Interim stay order dated 15.4.2013 shall continue.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN /32
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!