Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14844 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4446/2017 Satish Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Ram Kumar Sharma, Aged about 56 years, Presently Working As Panchayat Extension Officer, District Collector Office, Bhilwara, District- Bhilwara.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhilwara, District- Bhilwara.
----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4447/2017 Nand Kishore Soni Son Of Shri Kanhaiya Lal Soni, Aged about 59 years, Presently Working As Panchayat Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Mandalgarh, District- Bhilwara.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhilwara, District- Bhilwara.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4463/2017 Munna Mohd. Shekh Son Of Shri Ahmed Noor, Aged about 57 years, Presently Working As Panchayat Extension Officer, Panchayat Samiti- Suwana, District- Bhilwara.
----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Bhilwara, District- Bhilwara.
----Respondents
(2 of 2) [CW-4446/2017]
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikash Choudhary
For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
16/12/2022
Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the
controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a
judgment rendered by the Jaipur Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.5400/2015 "Rajkumar Agrawal Vs. State
of Rajasthan & Anr." allowed on 12.04.2017, wherein the
incumbent-petitioner on being declared surplus by the Irrigation
Department, was absorbed on the post of Gram Sewak in the
Panchayati Raj Department on a lower pay scale.
For the self same reasons, the present writ petitions are
allowed and the decision taken by the respondents to the
detriment of the petitioners regarding grant of pay protection are
declared as null & void for facilitating grant of consequential
benefits in terms of aforesaid verdict.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 53-55-/Vivek/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!