Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pappu @ Maksood Khan vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 14637 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14637 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Pappu @ Maksood Khan vs State Of Rajasthan on 13 December, 2022
Bench: Farjand Ali

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1013/2022

Pappu @ Maksood Khan S/o Jahrudeen @ Tida Mev, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bhandara, P.s. Jurehara, District Bharatpur. (At Present Lodged At Central Jail, Udaipur)

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Charan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh - PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

13/12/2022

Heard learned counsel for the accused-appellant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of

sentence. Perused the judgment and order impugned and the

material available on record.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the accused-appellant

that the appellant is not named in the FIR but he had not been

kept veiled while effecting arrest. The identification parade

conducted by the prosecution is vitiated on this ground alone

because the face of the appellant was open right from the date of

his arrest. It is further submitted that the officer before whom the

identification parade was conducted has not been produced in the

evidence during the trial. He was apprehended after passing of

one year of the incident and nothing has been recovered from

(2 of 3) [SOSA-1013/2022]

him. He has served almost five years in prison. He was given the

benefit of bail even during the course of trial. The matter has

already been admitted for the purpose of re-appreciation of the

evidence adduced before the trial court but the hearing of appeal

is likely to take a long time and thus, in the given circumstances,

his further incarceration would not be justified in any manner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the

prayer regarding suspension of sentence. It is submitted that the

accused-appellant was identified in the parade but he does not

dispute the fact that the officer before whom the parade was

conducted has not been produced in the evidence during the trial.

Considering the submissions advanced by the learned

counsel for the parties, this Court deems it just and proper to

suspend the sentence awarded to the accused-appellant.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge,

Rajsamand vide judgment dated 29.06.2022 in Sessions Case

No.30/2014 (CIS No.198/2014) against the appellant-applicant

Pappu @ Maksood Khan S/o Jahrudeen @ Tida Mev shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be

released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 16.01.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

(3 of 3) [SOSA-1013/2022]

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J 151-AK Chouhan/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter