Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14559 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc Second Suspension Of Sentence Application
(Appeal) No. 371/2022
IN
S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1414/2019
Dinesh @ Diniya @ Lala Ram S/o Dungraram, Aged About 35
Years, By Caste Jat, R/o Village Bhurtiya, Baitu Police Station,
District Barmer. (Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Sr. Adv., assisted
by Mr. Bhanwar Lal Dudy &
Ms. Priyanka Borana
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
12/12/2022
Counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this Court to
order dated 02.08.2022 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of
Sentence Application (Appeal) No.371/2022 and submits that
there was an elementary effect in the proceedings which arose
due to FSL not being treated as Exhibit and it was to be put in
Part-II, rather than Part-I, which deprived the appellant an
opportunity to confront.
Counsel for the appellant submits that once such a flaw in
the trial has happened, then this Court ought to give benefit of
such flaw to the accused while considering his application for
suspension of sentence.
(Downloaded on 14/12/2022 at 12:06:42 AM)
(2 of 2) [SOSA-371/2022]
Counsel for the appellant has referred to the judgment of
Hon`ble Supreme Court in Babu Singh and Ors. Vs. The State
of U.P., reported in 1978 AIR 527, whereby second
consideration at a later stage has been dealt with.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.
Upon careful perusal of record as well as conjoint
consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the
opinion that through the flaw pointed out may have caused some
difficulty to the accused but at the same time connection between
him and the crime has been dealt with in earlier order of dismissal
of suspension of sentence application by this Court passed in S.B.
Criminal Appeal No.1414/2019, decided on 04.09.2021 and any
re-consideration of the issue at this stage is not warranted even
on the count that there are 16 cases of heinous nature, which
were lodged against the present appellant, and out of that five
cases are of NDPS Act.
In light of the aforesaid observation and the earlier order
passed, the present second suspension of sentence application is
also dismissed.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
127-Sanjay/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!