Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14205 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2022
(1 of 3) [CRLMP-3670/2015]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 3670/2015
Saddique Khan And Ors.
----Petitioner
Versus
State And Ors.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. JK Suthar.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
Mr. Surendra Thanvi.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
02/12/2022
Learned counsel for the respondents has drawn attention of
this Court towards the judgment passed by this Court in Gulab
Sarifh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Criminal
Misc. Petition No.4220/2017), decided on 20.02.2019, the
order dated 20.02.2019 reads as follows:-
"1. Counsel for the respondent points out from order
dated 08.10.2013 passed by learned Revenue Authority
that stay is operating in favour of petitioners regarding
Khasra No.416/6 on an application filed under Section
212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act.
2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that the petitioners shall not lay any claim over
Khasra No.416/6 and shall render his co-operation for
(Downloaded on 07/12/2022 at 09:32:09 PM)
(2 of 3) [CRLMP-3670/2015]
the order dated 8.10.2013 to be vacated to the extent it
pertains to Khasra No.416/6.
3. In light of such limited submission, learned counsel
for the respondent agrees that the FIR was lodged just
to overcome the revenue proceedings pertaining to
Khasra No.416/6 in order dated 8.10.2013.
4. Perused the investigation report.
5. The investigation report furnished by I.O. is not
satisfactory. This Court is of the view that allegation
regarding Khasra No.416/6 cannot be maintained as the
petitioners themselves are not claiming the same and the
respondents categorically state that they have no dispute
beyond that.
6. Thus, with the consent of counsel for the parties,
the misc. petition is allowed. FIR No.105/2017, P.S.
Chhatargarh, District Bikaner lodged qua the petitioners
for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-
B IPC is quashed and set aside in light of undertaking
given counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners does
not claim any right over Khasra No.416/6 and acceptance
of the respondent to close the criminal proceedings upon
such undertaking. It shall be open for the parties to
move to the Tehsildar concerned for appropriate
demarcation of land and the Tehsildar in turn shall make
such demarcation as per rights of the parties preferably
within three months from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order. The parties shall be bound by their
stand before this Court regarding the dispute in hand."
In light of the aforesaid order and with the consent of both
the parties, the present misc. petition is allowed and impugned
order dated 14.12.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions
Judge No.2, Bikaner in Criminal Revision Petition No.39/2015 as
well as the order dated 01.08.2015 passed by learned Sub
Divisional Magistrate, Chhatargarh, District Bikaner in Case
(Downloaded on 07/12/2022 at 09:32:09 PM)
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-3670/2015]
No.07/2015 are quashed and set aside. The record of the learned
Trial Court be sent back forthwith.
All pending application applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
85-jitender/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!