Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5750 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 251/2018
1. Ramlal S/o Sh. Onkar Lal,
2. Gajanand S/o Laturlal,
3. Rameshwar S/o Laturlal,
4. Rakesh S/o Latur,
5. Manoj Kumar S/o Latur,
6. Ramdulari D/o Latur,
7. Shantibai W/o Latur, All R/o Gram Rataikalan, Tehsil
Shahbhad, Distt. Baran, Rajasthan.
----Appellants
Versus
1. Prabhulal S/o Khemchand, R/o Khusiyara, Tehsil
Shahbhad, Distt. Baran, Rajasthan.
2. Sub Registrar Ex. Officio Naib Tehsildar, Kelwada, Tehsil
Shahbad, Distt. Baran, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
23/08/2022
1. Show cause notices were issued to respondents, however no
one has put in appearance.
2. Learned counsel for appellants submits that by virtue of law
of natural succession, the suit property devolves upon appellants
and the respondent No.1 does not get any right in the suit
property on the basis of 'Will' alleged to be executed by Smt.
Daniya. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that Smt.
Daniya herself has left her husband and went to Nata with Kallu
(2 of 2) [CSA-251/2018]
and therefore, her 'Will' is without authority and illegal. The trial
court vide judgment dated 03.06.2016, declared the 'Will' as null
and void, however the first appellate court has set aside the
decree of trial court and dismissed appellants' suit. Learned
counsel for appellants further submits that since the first appellate
court has not decided issue No.1 and 2, therefore, the matter may
be remanded back to the first appellate court to consider and
pass findings in relation to issue No.1 and 2 and then, first appeal
may be decided afresh.
3. Having heard learned counsel for appellant-plaintiffs, the
second appeal is admitted on the following substantial question
of law:-
"Whether the first appellate court committed jurisdictional error in not deciding the issue Nos.1 & 2 and quashing the judgment and decree dated 03.06.2016?"
4. Issue notice to respondents for hearing of the appeal.
5. On the request of learned counsel for appellants, service of
notice upon respondent No.2-Sub-Registrar is dispensed with,
hence notice be issued to respondent No.1 only. Notices be issued
by both modes ordinary as well as registered post.
6. Record of courts below be summoned.
7. In the meanwhile, findings in the impugned judgment and
decree dated 13.04.2018 passed in civil first appeal No.36/2016
by the court of Additional District Judge No.1, Baran shall not
affect the proceedings pending before the revenue authority.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/80
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!