Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 10535 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10535 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 August, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Jitendra Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 August, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                        JODHPUR
     S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail (Suspension of Sentence) Application
                                No.713/2022

                                        IN

                 S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1179/2022

1.       Devraj S/o Taraji Mali, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ramdev
         Colony Jalore Dist. Jalore (At Present Lodged In Central
         Jail Jodhpur)
2.       Mangilal S/o Danaji Mali, Aged About 53 Years, R/o
         Rajendra Nagar Jalore Dist. Jalore (At Present Lodged In
         Central Jail Jodhpur)
3.       Jitendra S/o Babulal Mali, Aged About 28 Years, R/o
         Rajendra Nagar Jalore Dist. Jalore (At Present Lodged In
         Central Jail Jodhpur)
                                                                   ----Appellants
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Bharat Kumar S/o Chunilal, B/c Meghawal R/o Rilayans
         Pentrol Pump Bagra Road Jolore Ps Jalore
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Sr. Advocate a/w
                                Ms. Laxmi Rathore
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP
                                Mr. Paramveer Singh



       HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

16/08/2022
       Admit.

       Record has already been received.

       Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application

seeking suspension of sentence no.713/2022.




                     (Downloaded on 17/08/2022 at 08:10:01 PM)
                                      (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1179/2022]


     Counsel for the appellant has shown statement of PW-5 Dr.

Rameshchandra Chauhan, in which, he categorically deposes that

all the injuries are simple in nature.

     Counsel for the appellant further submits that there is

likelihood of the appeal being heard at an early date, thus, prayed

to suspend the sentence.

     Learned PP opposed the application.

     Having considered of the totality of facts and circumstances

of the case, I consider it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused appellant.


     Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentences is

allowed and it is directed that the sentences awarded to

appellant/s - (1) Devraj S/o Taraji Mali, (2) Mangilal S/o

Danaji Mali and (3) Jitendra S/o Babulal Mali by the learned

Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Jalore vide

judgment dated 16.07.2022 in Sessions Case No.67/2019 (CIS

No.59/2014) shall remain suspended till final disposal of aforesaid

appeal provided each of them executes a personal bond for a sum

of Rs.50,000/- alongwith two solvent sureties in the sum of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their

appearance before this Court on 29.09.2022 and whenever called

upon to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions

inidcated below:-

      (1)   That he/she/they will appear before the trial court in

      the month of January of every year till the appeal is

      decided.




                    (Downloaded on 17/08/2022 at 08:10:01 PM)
                                                                            (3 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1179/2022]


                                          (2)      That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence,

                                          he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed

                                          address to the trial court as well as to the counsel in the

                                          High Court.

                                          (3)      Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they

                                          will give in writing their changed address(s) to the trial

                                          court.

                                         The learned trial court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

                                   order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

                                   Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

                                   relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

                                   case the said accused-applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

                                   court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

                                   Court for cancellation of bail.


                                                                   (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

215-Sanjay/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter