Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bheem Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 6323 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6323 Raj
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Bheem Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 April, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                         (1 of 3)                    [CRLR-310/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 310/2022

Bheem Singh S/o Sh. Bhoor Singh, Aged About 51 Years, B/c
Rajput, R/o Village Anadara, Police Station Anadara, Tehsil
Reodar, District Sirohi (Raj.) (Presently Lodged In District Jail,
Sirohi)
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                   ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Pradeep Shah
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mukesh Trivedi, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

28/04/2022

     In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its

highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being

maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of

all concerned.

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the

respondent No.1-State. Hence, notice need not be issued.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Revision) No.88/2022.

     Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out from the FSL

report that the contents were ethyl alcohol.

     Learned     Public   Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension    of

sentence (revision) application.


                     (Downloaded on 28/04/2022 at 08:57:32 PM)
                                           (2 of 3)                [CRLR-310/2022]



     I have considered the rival arguments advanced by the

parties and perused the judgments of the courts below.

       Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Revision)

No.88/2022 filed under Section 397 & 401 Cr.P.C. is allowed and

it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Sirohi in Criminal Case No.268/2013 (309/2017) vide

order dated 25.02.2014 as affirmed by the learned Special Judge

SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, Sirohi vide order dated

30.03.2022 in Criminal Appeal No.32/2018 (28/2014) (C.I.S.

No.352/2014) against the petitioner Bheem Singh S/o Sh.

Bhoor Singh, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid revision and he shall be released on bail, provided he

executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for his appearance in this court on 27.05.2022 and

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the revision on the

conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the

           month of January of every year till the revision is

           decided.

     2.    That if the petitioner changes the place of

           residence, he will give in writing his changed

           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

           in the High Court.

     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

           they will give in writing their changed address to

           the trial Court.




                      (Downloaded on 28/04/2022 at 08:57:32 PM)
                                                                                (3 of 3)                [CRLR-310/2022]



                                         The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-petitioner in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   petitioner was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused-petitioner does not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.



                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

188-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter