Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kanhaiya Lal vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 6239 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6239 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kanhaiya Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 April, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
                                         (1 of 3)                  [CRLR-376/2022]


     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
           S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 376/2022

1.      Kanhaiya Lal S/o Banshi Lal, Aged About 86 Years, R/o
        Village Khor, At Present R/o House No. 3/348, Old
        Housing Board, Pali, District Pali. (Lodged In District Jail,
        Pali)
2.      Mahendra Kumar S/o Chunni Lal, Aged About 43 Years, B/
        c Keer, R/o 98, Keero Ki Dhani, Pali, Distt. Pali. (Lodged
        In District Jail, Pali)
3.      Kalu Singh S/o Prabhu Singh, Aged About 49 Years, B/c
        Ravana Rajput, R/o Village Khor, Tehsil And District Pali.
        (Lodged In District Jail, Pali)
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. T.R. Singh Sodha
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. SS Rajpurohit, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

27/04/2022
1.   In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its

highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being

maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of

all concerned.

2.   Admit. Call for the record.

3.   No need to issue notice as the learned PP is already

appearing for the respondent-State.

4.   Counsel for the petitioner submits that the maximum

sentence awarded to accused-petitioner is of six months' simple

imprisonment and final adjudication of revision petition is likely to

                     (Downloaded on 27/04/2022 at 08:47:15 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                     [CRLR-376/2022]


take a long time, thus, prayed to suspend the sentence of

accused..

5.   Learned PP opposed the application.

6.   Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and

upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the Bar, this

Court is of the opinion that the bail application for suspension of

sentence filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted.

7.   Accordingly, this Suspension of sentence Application

No.116/2022 is allowed. It is ordered that the sentence passed

by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pali vide dated

14.01.2020 in Criminal Original Case No.1252/2014, affirmed by

the learned Sessions Judge, Pali in Criminal Appeal No.13/2020

vide judgment dated 22.04.2022 against the petitioners (1)

Kanhaiya Lal S/o Banshi Lal, (2) Mahendra Kumar S/o

Chunni Lal and (3) Kalu Singh S/o Prabhu Singh shall be

released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of learned trial judge for their appearance before

the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court on or before 30.05.2022 and

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the present revision

on the conditions indicated below:-

            1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial
            Court in the month of January of every year till the
            revision is decided.
            2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of
            residence,    he/she/they            will     give   in     writing
            his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as
            well as to the counsel in the High Court.




                     (Downloaded on 27/04/2022 at 08:47:15 PM)
                                                                              (3 of 3)                [CRLR-376/2022]


                                               3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s),
                                               they will give in writing their changed address to
                                               the trial Court.


                                   8.           The learned trial Court shall keep the record of

                                   attendance of the accused-petitioner in a separate file. Such file

                                   be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in

                                   which the accused-petitioner was tried and convicted. A copy of

                                   this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference.

                                   Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical

                                   purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial

                                   court. In case the said accused-petitioner does not appear before

                                   the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to

                                   the High Court for cancellation of bail.



                                                                  (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

161-nirmala/Sanjay

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter