Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manaram Patel vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 6177 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6177 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 April, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Manaram Patel vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 April, 2022
Bench: Rekha Borana

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9905/2018

Manaram Patel S/o Durgaji, Aged About 50 Years, Adkaliya, Tehsil (Ph), District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, through The Secretary, Department Of Secondary, Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Director, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner

3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education Department, Udaipur

4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education Department, Udaipur

----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8861/2018 Hemandar Dutt Rawal Father/o Nanda Lal Rawal, Aged About 54 Years, V/p Jhadol, Tehsil Jhadol (Ph.), District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajsthan, through The Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

2. Director, Secondary Education Department, Bikaner.

3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education Department, Udaipur.

4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education Department, Udaipur.

----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8896/2018 Krishan Gopal Paneri S/o Shri Govind Ram Paneri, Aged About 48 Years, V/p Jhadol, Tehsil Jhadol (Ph.), District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

                                                                       ----Petitioner



                                               (2 of 5)                      [CW-9905/2018]


                                          Versus

1. State Of Rajsthan through The Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,

2. Director, Secondary Education Department,

3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education Department,

4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education Department,

----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8914/2018 Pushpa Mishra Spouse/o Kirti Kumar Shukla, Aged About 50 Years, V/p Jhadol, Tehsil Jhadol (Ph.), District Udaipur, Rajasthan, through Her Husband Mr. Kirti Kumar Shukla Aged About 53 Years, As She Is Presently Suffering From The Severe Malaria.

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajsthan, through The Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

2. Director, Secondary Education Department,

3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education Department,

4. District Education Officer, Elementary Education Department,

----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9305/2018 Kavita Lalas Spouse/o Shri Arvind Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Narpada, Tehsil Jalore, District Jalore.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, through The Secretary, Deparmtent Of Education, Jaipur.

2. The Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.

(3 of 5) [CW-9905/2018]

4. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jalore.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanwar Singh Mr. Vikram Singh for Mr. S.S. Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sarvan Kumar for Mr. Hemant Choudhary

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA

Order

27/04/2022

The present writ petitions have been filed with a prayer for

quashing of the list issued on 16.06.2018 qua the petitioners.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that the

controversy involved in the present matters has been decided in

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9282/2019 : Babu Lal Puniya v.

State of Rajasthan & Ors. In Babu Lal Puniya case (supra), it

had been held as under:

"From the above operational guidelines, it is apparent that it is only the DEO (Hqrs), Secondary Education, who has the jurisdiction to pass the orders for transfer of the petitioners from Primary Education to Secondary Education and accord postings being their appointing authority and, therefore, entire petition based on the submission regarding lack of jurisdiction, has no substance.

Consequently, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are dismissed leaving it open for them to approach the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, in case they have any

(4 of 5) [CW-9905/2018]

grievance qua the issues other the authority of the DEO (Hqrs), Secondary Education."

Learned counsel for the petitioners does not refute the above

position but they make a specific submission that the compliance

of Rule 6D of the Rules of 1971 has not been made in the present

matter and the respondents be directed to make the compliance of

the same.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon the

judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16671/2015:

Surendra Kumar Bhatt & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

In Surendra Kumar Bhatt's case (supra), the following

observation had been made by the Court:

"Accordingly, while not interfering in the impugned order for the reasons given above, the writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondents to look into the seniority of all teachers, so transferred. If any senior teacher is left out and at the same time, junior teacher has been transferred, then they are directed to correct the order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

It is made clear that compliance of the directions given by this Court would be made in strict terms and while revising the list, if so required. It would be in strict adherence to the provisions of Rule 6D of the Rules of 1971 and in future also, similar exercise would not be taken in violation of the said rule, otherwise the Department is directed to fix the responsibility of the officer concerned so that litigation may not come on account of violation of Rule 6D of the Rules of 1971."

(5 of 5) [CW-9905/2018]

In view of the ratio as laid down in Babu Lal Puniya's case

(supra), while making the interim orders passed in the writ

petitions absolute, the present writ petitions are disposed of.

The respondents would be at liberty to pass fresh transfer

orders in light of the subsequent judgments. It is made clear that

the adherence to the provisions of Rule 6C of the Rajasthan

Education State and Subordinate Services Rules, 2021 (akin to

Rule 6D of the Rules of 1971) would be strictly made as laid down

in the case of Surendra Kumar Bhatt.

All pending applications also stand disposed of.

(REKHA BORANA),J

42 to 46-Dharmendra/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter