Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5428 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Writ Contempt No. 665/2021
Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Mangi Ram, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 13, Village Harpaloo Kushala, Post- Harpaloo Tal, Tehsil-Rajgarh, District Churu (Raj.).
----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The Government, Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Shri Sanwar Mal Verma, District Collector, Churu.
3. Shri Pankaj Kumar, The Sub Divisional Officer Rajgarh, District Churu.
4. Shri Amarjeet Babal, Block Development Officer Panchayat Samiti, Rajgarh, Tehsil - Rajgarh District Churu.
5. Shri Ranveer Soni, Village Development Officer Gram Panchayat, Harpaloo Kushala, Tehsil - Rajgarh, District Churu.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.R. Jajra
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ramdayal Choudhary, Deputy
Government Counsel
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS
Order
12/04/2022
The petitioner Rajesh Kumar has filed the instant
contempt petition in reference to the order dated 13.10.2020
passed by the Division Bench in D.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.9762/2020, whereby the respondents were directed to act in
accordance with the earlier judgments of this court in the cases of
(2 of 2) [WCP-665/2021]
Gulab Kothari Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [DBCWP
No.1554/2004 decided on 12.01.2017] and Jagdish Prasad
Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ
Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018 decided on 30.01.2019] and
to remove the encroachments, if any, on the Government lands.
Mr. Ramdayal Choudhary, learned Deputy Government
Counsel, drew the court's attention to the orders passed by the
Single Bench of this court on 21.10.2021 and 16.03.2022 in S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.14343/2021 (School Development and
Management Committee, Harpalu Kushala Vs. State of Rajasthan
& Ors.] and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3895/2022 [Rajkumar Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Ors.] respectively, whereby on the prayer
made by some of the alleged encroachers, order of status quo has
been passed regarding the land in question.
In view of the above, apparently, the respondents
cannot take steps for removal of the alleged encroachments
because status quo order has been passed by this court regarding
the same land. Thus, leaving the petitioner at liberty to renew the
prayer made in this contempt petition at an appropriate stage
after disposal of the writ petitions pending before the learned
Single Bench, the instant contempt petition is disposed of for the
present.
(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J (SANDEEP MEHTA),J
37-Pramod/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!