Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vardha Ram vs State Of Rajasthan
2022 Latest Caselaw 5419 Raj

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5419 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2022

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Vardha Ram vs State Of Rajasthan on 12 April, 2022
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 344/2022

1.     Vardha Ram S/o Natha Ji, Aged About 58 Years, R/o
       Gulab Ganj, Ps Anadra, Tehsil Reodar, District Sirohi.
2.     Rama Ram S/o Mana Ji, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gulab
       Ganj, Ps Anadra, Tehsil Reodar, District Sirohi.
3.     Bharat @ Bhura Ram S/o Vardha Ram, Aged About 26
       Years, R/o Gulab Ganj, Ps Anadra, Tehsil Reodar, District
       Sirohi.
4.     Laxman S/o Nana Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Gulab
       Ganj, Ps Anadra, Tehsil Reodar, District Sirohi.
5.     Champat @ Sampat S/o Vardha Ram, Aged About 32
       Years, R/o Gulab Ganj, Ps Anadra, Tehsil Reodar, District
       Sirohi.
                                                                  ----Appellants
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. B.S. Deora
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. S.K. Bhati, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                     Order

12/04/2022

     In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its

highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being

maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of

all concerned.

     Admit.

     Issue notice.

     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the

respondent-State. Hence, notice need not be issued.


                     (Downloaded on 13/04/2022 at 08:35:53 PM)
                                          (2 of 3)                   [CRLAS-344/2022]



     Call for the record.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.256/2022.

     Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the learned

trial court has temporarily suspended the sentence of the present

accused-appellants.

     Learned    Public     Prosecutor         opposes         the   suspension   of

sentence application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court considers it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellants.

     Accordingly,     S.B.     Suspension            of    Sentence      (Appeal)

No.256/2022 filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court

vide judgment dated 22.03.2022 in Original Special Case No.

21/2013 (CIS No.123/2014) against appellants- (1) Vardha Ram

S/o Natha Ji, (2) Rama Ram S/o Mana Ji, (3) Bharat @

Bhura Ram S/o Vardha Ram, (4) Laxman S/o Nana Ram

and (5) Champat @ Sampat S/o Vardha Ram shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided each

of them execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for their appearance in this Court on 12.05.2022 and

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-

     1.    That they will appear before the trial Court in the
           month of January of every year till the appeal is
           decided.

     2.    That if the appellants changes the place of

                      (Downloaded on 13/04/2022 at 08:35:53 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-344/2022]


                                                residence, they will give in writing their changed
                                                address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel
                                                in the High Court.

                                        3.      Similarly, if the sureties change their address,
                                                they will give in writing their changed address to
                                                the trial Court.

                                        The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered

                                   as Criminal misc. Case related to original case in which the

                                   accused-appellants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

                                   shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

                                   file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

                                   to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

                                   said accused appellants do not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                    (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.

7-Zeeshan

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter