Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5306 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2022
(1 of 2) [CRLR-478/1996]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 478/1996
Bhanwarlal And Ans
----Petitioner
Versus
State
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Shah
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
08/04/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being
maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of
all concerned.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order
taking cognizance under Section 498-A IPC is barred by law. The
punishment prescribed is 03 years and as per Section 468 Cr. P.C.,
limitation of three years is prescribed.
Counsel for the petitioner has taken this Court to the
conclusive paragraph of impugned judgment, in which, the learned
court below has mentioned that cruelty of second marriage was
happened 08 years ago and 03 years ago the complainant went to
her parental place with her daughter.
Counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the
judgment of Hon`ble Apex Court in Arun Vyas & Anr. Vs. Anita
Vyas dated 14.05.1999
(Downloaded on 08/04/2022 at 08:45:54 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLR-478/1996]
This Court is convinced that looking into facts of the case as
well as reading of impugned judgment, the bar of Section 468
Cr. P.C., is operating.
The revision petition is allowed. The impugned order dated
05.11.1996 passed by learned additional Sessions Judge, Sojat
camp Jetaran in Criminal Revision No.24/95 (State Vs. Bhanwarlal
& Ors.) is quashed and set aside.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
21-nirmala/Sanjay
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!