Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5210 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 476/1994
S.C.Goyal And Anr
----Appellant
Versus
Haiyat And Ors
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mukesh Rajpurohit, ASG
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar for
Mr. Vineet Jain, Sr. Adv.
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
07/04/2022
In wake of instant surge in COVID-19 cases and spread of its
highly infectious Omicron variant, abundant caution is being
maintained, while hearing the matters in Court, for the safety of
all concerned.
The appellant has preferred this criminal appeal claiming for
the following prayer:-
"It is therefore, humbly prayed that the appeal may kindly be
allowed and the judgment passed by the learned Additional
Sessions Judge, Barmer may kindly be set aside and the
accused respondents be convicted for the offences."
Mr. Mukesh, Rajpurohit, counsel for the Union of India
submits that sufficient proof was their before the trial court and
17 prosecution witnesses were produced to discharge the burden
of proof effectively.
Counsel for the appellant submits that on 12.09.1988
Officers of Customs Department received secret information that a
(Downloaded on 08/04/2022 at 08:35:01 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLA-476/1994]
truck no. RJ-C-4450 was carrying some contraband. Upon being
stopped, the persons concerned ran away and upon inquiry from
truck driver he told his name as Bagta Ram and the person who
ran away was stated to be Jaggu Khan. Upon being searched
certain contraband was recovered.
Counsel for Union of India submits that the recovery of
vehicle, contraband and persons Bagta Ram and Jaggu Khan in
pursuance of story of prosecution is well supported by the
circumstantial evidence as well as the evidence on record.
Counsel for the respondent however, points out basic
discrepancy in the story of prosecution as a mandatory provisions
of NDPS Act were not adhered to. Counsel for the respondent
submits that the incident is of about 34 years old and FSL report
did not prove the sample of contraband was examined with full
sanctity.
The learned trial court has considered that the FSL report,
which is critical for establishing the contraband, but has
completely failed the test of law.
This Court after hearing counsel for the parties and perusing
record finds that learned trial court has rendered the judgment on
the strength of complete failure of FSL report to establish the
contraband in-question. Thus, no cause of interference is made
out.
The appeal is dismissed.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
35-Sanjay/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!