Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3294 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 40/2021
Shivang Singh Gour S/o Shri Kuldeep Singh,
----Appellant-Plaintiff
Versus
Ummed Singh Gour S/o Late Shri Laxman Singh, Ji, & Ors.
----defendant-respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Puri
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
25/04/2022
Learned counsel for appellant-plaintiff submits that in the
present civil suit, even the Bank is not party and plaintiff has filed
the civil suit confining to challenge the patta dated 16.05.2002 of
the JDA as forged.
Learned counsel for appellant submits that the present civil
suit is not related to staying the recovery of Bank for its due loan.
He further submits that the trial court has committed illegality and
jurisdictional error in rejecting the plaintiff's suit under Order 7
Rule 11 (d) CPC applying the bar of Section 34 of The
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act, 2002)
in fact the bar of Section 34 is not applicable to the present nature
of civil suit.
Issue notice to respondents.
Notice be given "dasti" as prayed.
Since in stay application, it has been prayed that operation
and execution of impugned judgment and decree be stayed
(2 of 2) [CSA-40/2021]
whereas in fact appellant-plaintiff's suit has been rejected under
Order 7 Rule 11 CPC which has been affirmed by the first
appellate court, hence there is no scope for grant of any interim
relief in favour of appellant-plaintiff.
In view of above, the stay application stands dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SAURABH/17
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!