Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3185 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 81/2022
Mandir Shri Narsinghji,
----Appellant
Versus
Babulal Kumawat S/o Ramchandra Kumawat Thekedar & Ors.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Amit Jindal
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
20/04/2022
Appellant-plaintiff has filed this second appeal, assailing
judgment and decree dated 18.12.2021 passed by Additional Civil
Judge No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan II in Civil Suit No.115/2021
whereby suit for permanent injunction filed by appellant-plaintiff
has been dismissed, which has been affirmed by dismissing the
first appeal No.01/2022 vide judgment dated 10.03.2022 passed
by Additional Session Judge No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan II.
Counsel for appellant-plaintiff submits that the suit land is
not being used for agriculture purpose and situated within Abadi
area. Such averments have specifically mentioned in the civil suit,
hence, civil suit filed for permanent injunction in relation to such
nature of land is maintainable before the Civil Court.
Counsel for appellant has placed reliance on judgment
passed by the Hon. Supreme Court in case of Harpal Singh Vs.
Ashok Kumar [2018 DNJ (SC) 46].
(2 of 2) [CSA-81/2022]
Counsel for appellant also submits that the trial Court has
committed jurisdictional error in rejecting the plaint under Order 7
Rule 11 CPC whereas it is triable and can be decided by the Civil
Court.
Issue notice to respondents.
Record of the two Courts below be summoned.
In the meanwhile, both parties are directed to maintain
status quo in relation to the property in question as it exists today.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
SACHIN /12
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!