Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2945 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3949/2016
1. Pinku D/o Shri Ajeet Singh, Village- Jharoda, Tehsil-
Buhana, District- Jhunjhunu Rajasthan
2. Neelam Kumari D/o Shri Ajeet Singh, Village- Jharoda,
Tehsil- Buhana, District- Jhunjhunu Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Director, Medical Health And
Family Welfare Department, Government Of Ra, Swasthya
Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur
2. The Additional Director Training, Medical And Health
Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur
3. The Registrar, Rajasthan Nursing Council, B-39, Sardar
Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur
4. Incharge, Nursing Superintendent Of Health Worker
Female, District Training Centre Amarsar, Jaipur Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sandeep Garssa, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr.Neeraj Batra, Adv. with Mr.Ravindra Pal Singh, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR Order 07/04/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
controversy involved in the present writ petition is already decided
by this Court in S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1457/2021 (Jahida
Salma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and other connected
writ petitions, vide order dated 10.02.2022 and therein it has
been held that persons having the qualification of Adeeb-Mahir
from Jamia Urdu, Aligarh cannot be denied appointment on the
post of Health Worker (Female).
(2 of 2) [CW-3949/2016]
Learned counsel further submitted that on the basis of
judgment passed in the case of Jahida Salma Vs. State of
Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), the Co-ordinate Bench in S.B.
Civil Writ Petition No.19991/2017 (Kamla and Ors. Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and other connected petitions, vide
order dated 25.02.2022, has again disposed of the petitions.
Learned counsel also informed this Court that the
Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.221/2021
(Dhapu Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) vide order dated
02.02.2022, has upheld the order passed by the Single Bench and
the petitioner therein has been found entitled for appointment.
Learned counsel Mr.Neeraj Batra, appearing for the
respondents does not dispute the legal proposition.
This Court, considering the orders passed in the case of
Jahida Salma Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and
Kamla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and the order
passed by the Division Bench in the case of Dhapu Vs. The State
of Rajasthan & Ors. (supra), deems it appropriate to allow the
present writ petition and further directs to treat qualification of the
petitioners, as equivalent to 10 th Class. The consequential order
declaring result of the petitioners and treating them eligible for
appointment may also be issued.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands allowed.
The necessary compliance may be made by the respondents
within a period of four weeks.
(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR), J
Himanshu Soni/73
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!