Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2901 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 265/2016
WIMCO Ltd., Through Managing Director, S.G.A. Flaper And
Through Chairman, I.J.N. Swami, Having Its Office At Indian
Mercantile Chambers, Ballard Estate, R. Kamani Marg, Mumbai-
400 038 / D-37, Saket Colony, Opposite Adarsh Nagar Thana,
Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur / D-40, Adarsh Nagar Shopping Centre,
Jaipur, Through Its Power Of Attorney Holder, Mr. Mukesh Kumar
----Appellant-Defendant
Versus
1. Mr. Gopal Lal Agarwal S/o Mr. Jagdish Narain Agarwal, R/o
Jain Temple, Shivdaspura, Tehsil Chaksu, Distt. Jaipur
....Respondent-plaintiff
2. M/s. Tulsi Enterprises Through Its Manager Mr. Ramesh Murari, R/o D-37, Sanket Colony, Opposite Adarsh Nagar Thana, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur/ Firm Raghuveersharan Harinarain, Old Bus Stand, Chaksu, Distt. Jaipur
3. Mr. Raghuveersharan S/o Shri Laduraom Owner And Karta Partnership Firm Tulsi Enterprises, R/o D-37, Sanket Colony, Opposite Adarsh Nagar Thana, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur
4. Tulsi Devi W/o Shree Laduram, Owner Of M/s Tulsi Enterprises C/o Firm Raghuveersharan Harinarayan, Old Bus Stand Chaksu, Distt. Jaipur / Near Govt. Hospital, Mamodia Ka Mohalla, Chaksu Distt. Jaipur Through Legal Heirs-
4/1 Mr. Ramgopal S/o Mrs.Tulsi Devi W/o Late Shree Laduram 4/2 Mr. Harinarain S/o Tulsi Devi W/o Late Shree Laduram 4/3 Ramesh Murari S/o Tulsi Devi W/o Late Shree Laduram 4/4 Ramavtar S/o Mrs. Tulsi Devi W/o Late Mr. Laduram,
All R/o Mamodiya Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 14, Chaksu, Distt. Jaipur
----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 546/2017
(2 of 4) [CFA-265/2016]
1. Smt. Tulsi Devi W/o Shri Ladu Ram Owner M/s. Tulsi Enterprises, C/o M/s. Raghuveersharan Harinaraya, Old Bus Stand, Chaksu Distt. Jaipur/near Govt. Hospital, Mamodiya Ka Mohalla, Chaksu, Distt. Jaipur Through Her Lrs-
1/1. Ramgopal S/o Smt. Tulsi Devi W/o Shri Ladu Ram, 1/2. Ramesh Murari S/o Smt. Tulsi Devi W/o Shri Ladu Ram, 1/3. Ramavtar so called S/o Smt. Tulsi Devi W/o Shri Ladu Ram (Original Name Ramavtar Kumawat S/o Ramrakh Kumawat) All R/o Mamodiya Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 14, Chaksu, Distt. Jaipur
2. Raghuveersharan S/o Shri Laduram Owner And Working Partner M/s. Tulsi Enterprises, D-37, Saket Colony, Opp. Adarsh Nagar Police Station, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur/ M/s. Radhuveersharan Harinarayan, Old Bus Stand, Chaksu Distt. Jaipur (Appellant In Personal Capacity, Partner Firm Is Not In Existence)
----Appellants-Defendants Versus
1. Gopal Lal Agarwal S/o Shri Jagdish Narayan Agarwal Opp.
Jain Temple, Shivdaspura, Tehsil Chaksu Distt. Jaipur ..........Plaintiff-Respondent
2. Vimko Ltd., Through Managing Director, S.G.A.., Falepar And Through Chairman, I.j.n. Owner, Indian Mercantial Chamber, Blad Estate, R. Kamani Marg, Mumbai- 400038/d-37, Saket Colony, Opp. Adarsh Nagar Police Station, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur/d-40, Adarsh Nagar Shopping Centre, Jaipur Through Power Of Attorney, Mr. Mukesh Kumar
3. M/s. Tulsi Enterprises Through Ramesh Murari, D-37, Saket Colony, Opp. Adarsh Nagar Police Station, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur Firm M/s. Radhuveersharan Harinarayan, Old Bus Stand, Chaksu Distt. Jaipur .........Defendant/respondents
4. Hari Narayan S/o Shri Tulsi Devi W/o Late Shri Ladu Ram, Mamodiya Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 14, Chaksu, Distt. Jaipur
----Respondents-Proforma-Defendant
(3 of 4) [CFA-265/2016]
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anant Kasliwal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Vaibhav Kasliwal Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore for appellant in S.B. CFA NO.546/2017 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Tongawat Mr. Anant Kasliwal, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Vaibhav Kasliwal for respondent in S.B. CFA546/2017
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
06/04/2022
Both first appeals have been filed by defendants assailing the
common judgment and decree dated 28.01.2016 passed by
Additional District Judge No.4, Jaipur whereby and whereunder the
decree for recovery of an amount of Rs.4,95,000/- was passed in
favour of respondent-plaintiff No.1-Goapl Lal Agarwal.
During pendency of first appeal, the plaintiff proceeded for
execution of decree and during the course of execution
proceedings, it appears that the matter was placed before the
National Lok Adalat conducted on 12.03.2022 by the District Legal
Services Authority, Jaipur Metropolitan First, Jaipur.
Before the National Lok Adalat, both parties settled their
dispute and respondent-plaintiff-decree holder accepted the
cheque of decreetal amount with full satisfaction of the impugned
judgment and decree. The order passed by the National Lok
Adalat on 12.03.2022, which is duly signed by the respondent-
plaintiff-decree holder as well as appellant-defendant and other
parties is available on record. It has been mentioned in the order
itself that in view of such settlement between the parties, both
appeals can be disposed of accordingly.
(4 of 4) [CFA-265/2016]
Respondent-plaintiff-Gopal Lal Agarwal himself present in
person on 12.03.2022. Since parties have settled their dispute
before the National Lok Adalat and the impugned judgment and
decree dated 28.01.2016 stands satisfied, the challenge to the
judgment and decree become redundant and accordingly both
appeals have rendered infructuous.
Hence, both appeals are disposed of having become
infructuous, in view of the order dated 12.03.2022 passed before
the National Lok Adalat.
Stay applications and any other pending applications, if any,
stand(s) disposed of.
If, any amount is deposited by the appellants pursuant to the
interim order dated 28.07.2017 of this Court, the same may be
disbursed/released to the appellants.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/13-14
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!