Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2834 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Transfer Application No. 75/2022
Meeta Agarwal D/o Shri Meenalal Agarwal W/o Shri Manoj Kumar
Agarwal,
----Petitioner-plaintiff
Versus
Hathroigari Grah Nirman Sehkari Samiti, & ors.
----Respondent-Non-applicants
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sampat Lal Songara For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
04/04/2022
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner-
plaintiff has lost faith in the Presiding Officer of the Court of
Additional District Judge No.9, Jaipur Metropolitan II, Jaipur
before, whom her civil suit No.56/2020 (464/2012) (26/2014)
titled as Meeta Agarwal Vs.Hathroigari Grah Nirman Sehkari
Samiti & Ors. is pending.
The petitioner moved a transfer application under Section 24
of Code of Civil Procedure before the District Judge, Jaipur
Metropolitan II, Jaipur but the same was dismissed vide order
dated 22.03.2022. Even the comments from the concerned
Presiding Officer of the Court of Additional District June No.9,
Jaipur Metropolitan II, Jaipur were not called.
Learned counsel for petitioner placed reliance on the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pushpa
Devi Saraf and another Vs. Jai Narain Parasrampuria and
others AIR 1992 Supreme Court 1133::1992 AIR SCW
(2 of 2) [CTA-75/2022]
1023. It has been observed in para 9 of the judgment, which
reads as under:-
9. We, however, feel that the learned Presiding Officer has been unduly affected by the allegations levelled against him, as would be evidence from his report. In this view of the matter, we are inclined to think that in the interest of the learned Presiding Officer himself, the suit may be sent to another court. We, accordingly, request the learned District Judge, Kanpur to transfer the said suit (Suit No.537 of 1984 on the file of VIIth Additional District Judge, Kanpur) to such other."
Although, this Court does not appreciate the allegations
levelled by the petitioner-plaintiff against the concerned Presiding
Officer and do not countenance such practice of seeking transfer
of cases of such allegations, however following the ratio decidendi
propounded by the Hon'ble Surpeme Court in the case of Pushap
Devi Saraf (Supra), this Court deems it just and proper to
summon the report from the concerned Presiding Officer of
Additional District June No.9, Jaipur Metropolitan II, Jaipur and his
opinion about transfer of this case from his Court to any other
Court.
Issue notice to all respondent-non-applicants.
Notice be issued in both modes. One to be sent by ordinary
process and another by registered post.
Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the court
of Additional District June No.9, Jaipur Metropolitan II, Jaipur
where the present civil suit is pending to do the needful.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
TN/70
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!