Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5708 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 21 October, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.890/2021
(Suspension of Sentence Application)
In
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1459/2021
Mahendra Kumar S/o Mohan Lal, Resident Of Gainta Road, Police
Station Itawa, District Kota (Raj.)
(At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota)
----Accused-Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail (Suspension of Sentence)
Application No.858/2021
In S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1421/2021 Lekhraj Nagar S/o Bajrang Lal, R/o Gainta Road, Itawa, Police Station Itawa, District Kota (Raj.) (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Kota).
----Accused-Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Rajveer Sharma Mr. R.P. Vijay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Imran Khan, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
21/10/2021
Heard on applications for suspension of sentence.
(2 of 3) [CRLAS-1459/2021]
These applications have been filed by the appellants seeking
suspension of sentence passed by Additional Sessions Judge No.6,
Kota, in Sessions Case No.75/2012 (CIS No.87379/2014),
whereby the learned trial court has, vide judgment dated
07.09.2021, convicted the appellants and sentenced as under :-
U/s 304 Part-II of IPC - Simple imprisonment of five years
It has been submitted on behalf of counsel for the appellants
that appellant-Mahendra was not an employee of the Electricity
Department. He had no role in the incident. Deceased was
working without any authority on the electric pole. The death
occurred due to his own negligence. Appellant-Lekhraj had not
authorized the deceased to work on the electric pole. There is no
cogent and reliable evidence on record to connect the appellants
with the crime. Investigating Officer has not been examined
during trial. There are material contradictions in the evidence of
prosecution witnesses. Decision of appeals will take considerable
time.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record carefully.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the applications for
suspension of sentence.
Taking into consideration the submissions of learned counsel
for the appellants, evidence available on record and overall facts
and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon
detailed merits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to
allow the applications for suspension of sentence.
(3 of 3) [CRLAS-1459/2021]
Accordingly, the applications for suspension of sentence are
allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
appellants Mahendra Kumar S/o Mohan Lal and Lekhraj
Nagar S/o Bajrang Lal shall remain suspended till disposal of
criminal appeals and they shall be released on bail, provided each
of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties
of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for
their appearance in this Court on 22 nd November, 2021 and as and
when called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Hemant/63-64
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!