Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6687 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7315/2021
1. Smt. Komal Bai Prajapat Daughter Of Shri Rajendra
Prajapat, Wife Of Shri Bhore Lal, Aged About 21 Years,
Resident Of Maharajpur, Police Station Malakheda, Distrit
Alwar, At Present Resident Of 44, Khanpur Kalan, Tehsil
Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
2. Bhore Lal Son Of Shri Lala Ram, Aged About 28 Years,
Resident Of Resident Of 44, Khanpur Kalan, Tehsil
Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. The Director General Of Police, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Superintendent Of Police, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.)
4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Ramgarh,
District Alwar (Raj.)
5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Malakheda,
District Alwar (Raj.)
6. Rajendra Prajapat Son Of Shri Mangal Ram Prajapat,
Resident Of Village Maharajpur, Police Station Malakheda,
District Alwar (Raj.)
7. Yagraj Kumar Son Of Unknown, Aged About 38 Years,
Resident Of Village Punkhar, Police Station Malakheda,
District Alwar (Raj.)
8. Hitesh Kumar Son Of Shri Hari Ram Prajapat, Aged About
23 Years, Resident Of Village Maharajpur, Police Station
Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.)
9. Vijendra Kumar Son Of Shri Mangalram, Aged About 41
Years, Resident Of Village Maharajpur, Police Station
Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.)
10. Lalaram Son Of Shri Kaluram, Resident Of Village
Khanpur Kalan, Police Station Ramgarh, District Alwar
(Raj.)
11. Pushpendra Kumawat Son Of Unknown, Aged About 60
Years, Resident Of Jawahar Nagar, 200Ft. Road, Opposite
Star Resort, Alwar (Raj.)
(Downloaded on 26/11/2021 at 09:29:09 PM)
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-7315/2021]
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bheem Sain Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. F. R. Meena, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
20/11/2021
1. Petitioners have preferred this misc. petition seeking
direction of protection of life and liberty.
2. Petitioners are present in person in the Court. As per the
documents annexed, both are major. Certificate of Registration of
marriage is also annexed with the petition.
3. Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in "Smt. Nisha Tanwar vs.
State of Raj." (S.B. Criminal Writ No.493/2016), decided on
30.11.2016 allowed the petition and directed the S.H.O.
concerned to ensure necessary vigil so that no harm is caused to
the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of those who are
opposing the marriage.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. In view of the fact that petitioners are major and have
married, the misc. petition is allowed. Respondent No.4 is directed
to keep vigil so that no harm is caused to the petitioners from
their relatives.
6. Stay application stands disposed.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Nikhil Kr. Yadav / 142
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!