Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dhanraj @ Sattu vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 17528 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 17528 Raj
Judgement Date : 23 November, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dhanraj @ Sattu vs State on 23 November, 2021
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IIIrd Bail Application No. 12227/2021

Dhanraj @ Sattu S/o Bherulal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Uncha, Police Station Rashmi, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Rajsamand)

----Petitioner Versus State, Through Pp

----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IIIrd Bail Application No. 12228/2021 Pappu Khan S/o Anar Khan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Uncha, Police Station Rashmi, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Rajsamand.)

----Petitioner Versus State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandrasen Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Kumar, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

Judgment / Order

23/11/2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on

record.

The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.340/2019

of Police Station Bhim, Distt. Rajsamand for the offences

punishable under Sections 8/15 (C) of the NDPS Act. They

(2 of 3) [CRLMB-12227/2021]

have preferred these bail application under Section 439

Cr.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that it

is clear from the recovery memo and the statement of seizure

officer PW-I -Labhuram, the then S.H.O of Police Station

Bhim, Distt. Rajsamand that 3 bags containing poppy straw

were seized by the police and the Seizure Officer first mixed

the said poppy straw on a tarpaulin and thereafter took two

samples of 500 gms each from that mixture. Thus, it is clear

that the Seizure Officer did not collect separate samples from

each bag. It is also submitted that the I.O. has not stated

that the test by the U.N. Kit was carried out on each bag

before taking small quantity of poppy husk for samples.

Learned counsel for the petitioners while placing reliance

on the decision of this Court rendered in the case of Netram

Vs. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2014(1) Cr.L.R.

(Raj.) 163 has argued that this Court has held that if the

samples from each bag containing poppy husk/poppy straw

have not been collected and test by U.N.Kit has not been

conducted on each bag and if the Seizure Officer has taken

out some quantity of narcotic drug from each bag and after

mixing the same has taken out some portion for sample,

then, the same is not in conformity with the Standing

Instruction No.1/88 issued by the Narcotics Control Bureau,

New Delhi, particularly, Instruction No.1.7 and, as such, it

cannot be said that the narcotic contraband recovered in the

matter is of commercial quantity or above. It is, thus, prayed

that the petitioners may kindly be enlarged on bail.

(3 of 3) [CRLMB-12227/2021]

Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of

the case and substantial grounds taken in this bail application

and taking into consideration the judgment passed by this

Court in Netram's case (supra), this Court is of the opinion

that there are rare chances of petitioners' conviction and trial

of the case is likely to take time, this Court is inclined to

grant bail to the petitioners.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail

application.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and

circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on

the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail

to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section

439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners -

Dhanraj @ Sattu S/o Bherulal and Pappu Khan S/o Anar

Khan shall be released on bail in connection with FIR

No.340/2019 of Police Station Bhim, Distt. Rajsamand

provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for

their appearance before that court on each and every date of

hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion

of the trial.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

21-mohit/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter