Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2167 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 5 March, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 557/2019
1. Phooli Devi W/o Umrao, Resident Of Khairthal, District
Alwar Since Deceased Now Being Represented Through:-
1/1.Umrao Lal Saini S/o Sh. Khayali Ram Saini
1/ 2. Umashankar
1/3. Bhim Singh
1/ 4. Ram Kishore
1/5. Chimmanlal
1/6. Subhash
All S/o Phooli Devi, Resident Of Khairthal Tehsil
Kishanbas, District Alwar
----Plaintiffs-Appellants
Versus
1. Gyarsiram S/o Shri Ramsahai, B/c Mali, Resident Of Ward
No. 1 (Since Deceased) Now Being Represented Through
Following Legal Representatives:-
1/1. Anguri Devi W/o Gyasiram,
1/ 2. Raghunath S/o Gyasiram,
1/3. Pappu @ Ganpat S/o Gyasiram, resident of Ward
No.1, Khairthal
1/ 4. Heera Devi D/o Gyasiram W/o Shishram, Resident
Of Khairthal, Dist. Alwar
1/5. Vimla Devi Widow Of Not Known D/o Gyasiram,
Resident Of Khairthal, Dist. Alwar
1/6. Pappi D/o Gyasiram W/o Raghuveer Saini, Resident
Of Bawal, Dist. Rewari, Haryana
1/7. Suman D/o Gyasiram W/o Babu Lal Saini, Resident
Of Harsoli, Tehsil Kotkasim, Dist, Alwar
2 Municipal Council Through Executive Officer, Municipal
Council, Khairthal, Tehsil Kishangarhbas, Dist. Alwar
----Defendants-Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ajeet Kumar Bhandari (Through VC) For Respondent(s) :
(2 of 2) [CSA-557/2019]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR Order
05/03/2021
The instant civil second appeal has been filed by the
plaintiffs-appellants under Section 100 CPC against the judgment
and decree dated 23.10.2019 passed by the Court of Additional
District Judge, Kishangarhbas, No.2, Alwar (for short the "appellate
Court") in Civil Appeal No.13/2018 whereby the appellate Court while
dismissing the appeal filed by the plaintiffs-appellants affirmed the
judgment and decree dated 3.8.2009 passed by the Court of Civil
Judge, Kishangarhbas, Alwar in Civil Suit No.36/1998 by which the
suit filed by the plaintiff-appellant was dismissed.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
Perused the impugned judgments dated 23.10.2019 and
3.8.2009 passed by both the Courts below.
On perusal of the case file, I am of the view that there is
no substantial question of law involved in this appeal.
Both the Courts below decided the main issue with
regard to title in favour of defendants - respondents holding that
the construction of disputed wall was on the public way and the way
has been used by the residents of the colony. The findings recorded
by both the Courts below are concurrent findings of fact. Thus, the
impugned judgment and decree passed by both the Courts below
warrant no interference of the Court under Section 100 CPC.
The second appeal filed by the plaintiffs-appellants is
bereft of merit and accordingly stands dismissed.
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J
Dheeraj/44
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!