Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Birbal S/O Shri Gangaram vs The State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 3315 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3315 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Birbal S/O Shri Gangaram vs The State Of Rajasthan on 30 July, 2021
Bench: Pankaj Bhandari
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

     S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 80/2021

Birbal S/o Shri Gangaram, R/o Todawali Tan Amai Kotputli
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       The State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.p.
2.       Yogesh Kasana S/o Rohitash Kasana, R/o Vill. Amai Ps
         Kotputli Jaipur Dist. Jaipur
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Complainant- : Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta through VC Petitioner(s) For State : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

30/07/2021

1. Petitioner has filed this bail cancellation application under

Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.461/2019 was registered at Police Station Kotputli,

District Jaipur Rural for offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341

& 302 I.P.C.

3. It is contended by counsel for the complainant-petitioner that

wrong fact was stated before the Court for obtaining the bail. It is

also contended that in the order dated 21.05.2021, it was

mentioned that the allegation of causing injury to the deceased

was on Sher Singh, who was a minor has been given benefit of

bail. It is also contended that as far as the allegation of causing

injury to the deceased by Sher Singh is concerned, the fact is

clearly mentioned and Sher Singh is not minor and was not be

(2 of 2) [CRLBC-80/2021]

given benefit of bail, in fact Anil was minor and was given benefit

of bail.

4. I have considered the contentions.

5. As far as role of the accused-respondent is concerned, from

the statement of eye witnesses, it is evident that the injury was

caused by Sher Singh, it is also evident that in the order dated

21.05.2021, the fact that Anil was minor and was given benefit of

bail was not mentioned, hence in the change of circumstances of

the entire case, I am not inclined to entertain the bail cancellation

application.

6. This bail cancellation application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

ARTI SHARMA /3

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter