Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brajesh Rajput S/O Shri Devi Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 3251 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3251 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Brajesh Rajput S/O Shri Devi Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 July, 2021
Bench: Pankaj Bhandari
          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                      BENCH AT JAIPUR

          S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.
                               11283/2021

Brajesh Rajput S/o Shri Devi Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Vill. Langadhia Post Tareni Ps Ambha Dist. Muraina M.p.
(Presently Confined At Dist. Jail Jaipur)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                 ----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta present in the Court For Complainant(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh present in the Court For State : Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

28/07/2021

1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439

Cr.P.C.

2. F.I.R. No.233/2021 was registered at Police Station Bajaj

Nagar, District Jaipur for offence under Sections 376, 506, 504,

384 I.P.C.

3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that prosecturix

is a married lady. In the F.I.R. she has stated that petitioner

promised to marry her after concealing the factum of his being

married. It is also contended that since the prosecutrix is married,

there is no question of assurance being given to marry her. It is

further contended that in the F.I.R., it is mentioned that

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-11283/2021]

prosecutrix was having relationship with the petitioner since 2017.

There is inordinate delay in lodging of F.I.R.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant

have opposed the bail application. It is contended that petitioner is

a military man, who is absconding with one AK-47. It is also

contended that petitioner threatened the advocate of the

prosecutrix.

5. I have considered the contentions.

6. Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the

petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

7. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed

that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he

furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees

One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction

of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before

that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on

all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

so.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

ARTI SHARMA /53

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter