Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalu Lal vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 11516 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11516 Raj
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kalu Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 July, 2021
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                          JODHPUR
         S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 298/2021

Kalu Lal S/o Sh. Babu Lal, Aged About 30 Years, B/c Meghwal, R/
o Sawa, P.s. Sambhupura, Tehsil And District Chittorgarh.
                                                     ----Petitioner
                             Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.     Labh Chand S/o Sh. Narayanlal Acharya, Aged About 40
       Years, B/c Acharya, R/o Kannoj P.s. And Tehsil Bhadesar,
       Dist. Chittorgarh.
                                                 ----Respondents



For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Anil Vyas
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. M.S. Bhati, PP
                               Mr. B.S. Mertia



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

26/07/2021

     In wake of second surge in the COVID-19 cases, abundant

caution is being maintained, while hearing the matters in Court,

for the safety of all concerned.

     It is stated at Bar that a compromise has been arrived at

between the parties after the judgment dated 02.07.2019 passed

by the appellate court, whereby the judgment dated 29.05.2017

passed by the trial has been affirmed.

     It is borne out from the compromise that the complainant is

not inclined to proceed further in the matter.

     Learned counsel for the parties have placed reliance on a

decision of Supreme Court in case of Damodar S. Prabhu vs

Sayed Babalal H [2010(5) SCC 66].

     Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

since the parties have settled the dispute and complainant



                    (Downloaded on 26/07/2021 at 08:55:04 PM)
                                                                           (2 of 2)                [CRLR-298/2021]



                                   respondent No.2 had accepted the sum towards full and final

                                   settlement of the cheque, on the satisfaction of the complainant

                                   and in the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view

                                   of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S.

                                   Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (supra), the sentence awarded to the

                                   petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act is liable to be set

                                   aside. However, as compromise has been arrived at after rejection

                                   of the appeal preferred by the petitioner, a cost of 15% of the

                                   cheque amount deserves to be imposed upon the petitioner in the

                                   light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Apex court in the

                                   case of Damodar S. Prabhu (Supra).

                                        Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to deposit 15% of the

                                   cheque amount with the Deputy Secretary, Rajasthan State Legal

                                   Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of two weeks from

                                   today.

                                        The conviction and sentence of imprisonment awarded to the

                                   petitioner for offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments

                                   Act, vide judgment dated 29.05.2017 passed by learned Special

                                   Judicial Magistrate (N.I. Act Cases), Chittorgarh in Criminal Case

                                   No.2157/2015 as affirmed by judgment dated 02.07.2019 passed

                                   by learned Additional District and Session Judge No.3, Chittorgarh

                                   in Criminal Appeal No.163/2017, are hereby set aside on the basis

                                   of the aforesaid compromise.

                                        The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.

                                        Stay petition also stands disposed of.



                                                                (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

82-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter